Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 05 June 2017 06:47 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8243612944E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 23:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0bt2Mk4bH7jx for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 23:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22a.google.com (mail-vk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42E54129440 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 23:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id p62so26886167vkp.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 23:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IxUaS2vU8p7Wpbns27iMk+8H57YoWE3AXVDyeY+LneQ=; b=ROe29aUWPO/F4nmiF5TC6/w7tmxK/fFVDIVod68XlkHcwDr0V4EMtQgcbjDj3YsNUS vSIFH0axbQtu+xd4OCEoetOP8lLyMCgwt6iNjk9rNIxKbrd4FerzMMea/D+URig1X4NE lSG3kNEMju25+9Nhcv7dNC+QoiaiWnr2a+MRcFNRQ07td5o3MM78Hw54fxlaiz2NI0dt /QYjp2gcMFcc0eG671HYpmpRvNCLQU9VFhEmA59FZ4yi3dkb+sGDzDlQh3jWF25nw45f nHCzsqZQPLvZ1iIb11LM9YU5FHj3ZBMahWRLCAgFfeMB5sukEddBsnM+34XTMihPvBa2 Kckg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IxUaS2vU8p7Wpbns27iMk+8H57YoWE3AXVDyeY+LneQ=; b=MEpaBCIPEbrCoon30ri+Bco0Uh6GiHjhtwYkW9Hoa58Lzu/Ueku5UfM/zEuRSTMQz3 pfDBNa4bhZvq4AOOQoExRCGjP0mTjRSQuCI9K0UKX7aSxy3qqpt9PB2PvZ27hrzzV57c KxxA1aRogy602Ljj3f8rP3lcLF3GdxlFkHwdRmAk3SVX1M4YcBoWv6Cjc+ub328Lzega M1uP5tvuMTTeltKapRfOmCEVDWdUSIxuJKKnHLpBfIkefZHPjLi7FCtdoDoyR/QAI9qH KlY70b0L8UvpFO0TUvPvbEwvTgGNauhbPs8dEZjz7TnNBj5S+k9cXk7jGUxnABE1Rfoa ccJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBMA9HZdhFhEbLY2M+4J2xDzaRsOiQWAhH2EESHvQ53YCpcCkMK J6BQgxiV2qba8ZTJM6QosS8Wly+MHSLO
X-Received: by 10.31.33.81 with SMTP id h78mr3526308vkh.29.1496645219161; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 23:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.12.139 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 23:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <e892e15f-3479-8099-0d72-41fe18ecabb8@gmail.com>
References: <CAO42Z2wp72j-yOsR8C=iqS+dX14wLwthAtOTvD5ugj_NQ=NQag@mail.gmail.com> <8be34ef8-557f-652e-0d2f-f1a1e008bffd@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0d-BVeG6ceU=F4Jd864SFj6msofeOOi8GAcPxOLsA9dA@mail.gmail.com> <e892e15f-3479-8099-0d72-41fe18ecabb8@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 15:46:38 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1j5W7YpxVGUYfjfKXGmW=RKd98=2z8m-5TMdhjWRvJYA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>, draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c024caa525cc055130de38"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/xQP2TFwipjvU1dbpuSoQ1CdVffU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 06:47:01 -0000

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't doubt it. But nothing today stops them using DHCPv6 exclusively
> and deploying /120s - just too bad for any users of an o/s that doesn't
> support DHCPv6, right?
>

Today there's little penalty, because those users will be IPv4-only and
still have connectivity. Not sure what they would decide when they start
thinking about turning off IPv4. I suppose it would depend on how many of
their users use OSes that don't support DHCPv6.