IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)

james woodyatt <jhw@google.com> Thu, 08 June 2017 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC441293D9 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T4TJzmjpl2hT for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x230.google.com (mail-pg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D29F31286D6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x230.google.com with SMTP id f185so18161470pgc.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 10:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=DLLhhjlRN5BPdvtLFbswPm5Ps7v1AFK3Nj4K7VCXekk=; b=AnbeXU0cBTilHLO6n3en54mM9Ybge68knXgY2kjIJLPRT9xGF1j3fvUV69fyuGZyMw 81hafpgmpOndcsH4p/aWVajWI0Yf485QrvFCacEPXe68XTFctbwvQMnqwdfXryIc+nEf 1bDkhxgK/zlOLYUVHrVYkdegyT5GGBs32vlE8y84NRJX7K+fXzawjTz63IRSO/KqnCES fOtyqugRWiQ4/RP7cLdUPVTHyc2lok3Rx5jvSCUhgfDgKEB8F0KKCDxKOm6qcOTVk0pA lgswmH6+henDGz31ptzZkZ+7eszCym1/Hq9Z14x5m1ZMsjIkdJUoEFruQ+pXgtcB1XBa nGZg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=DLLhhjlRN5BPdvtLFbswPm5Ps7v1AFK3Nj4K7VCXekk=; b=jiL8C5n5uv/zZpM0sOXZuAMN0HqHggrlCPzW03QqfZdMdsWI6M3xHtfRb6oni/nFMQ W/5H1Cy22UTWxaHTXJ8BpFjBy8yUgr6ksIzZ0pKWt1LmodNWZKoXdIAlMAJ6XVhc1y+N z5lXhmtffzuMrZMmoJUn+K7vDMqmwVU1512m8m6DFanlHpUDuEwfrzjtNuxSJ/jMhy7y rWYyaSnAnOAdKFQMC3D7xbsc//NEIWmjZifvGiTwvPVRN/dbY9M8pZ6pKUfX4T6crL88 XH/Lk0ZCRTtRUa2NRnahs6UyGq0xeg6DgxDZDprvNWjbZSw8u9+KcmUfpmbxfa4HKmky o1eA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBsF/AV73k9YKe8iUdvlXARh7dxJ+BehHnU0oCPSjLuF+EekmLy uzEMktJ6CBNzAyqLnPq6wQ==
X-Received: by 10.98.39.2 with SMTP id n2mr27140009pfn.182.1496942749160; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 10:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.151.75.170] (mobile-166-177-251-145.mycingular.net. [166.177.251.145]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n4sm374103pgt.3.2017.06.08.10.25.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Jun 2017 10:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-0601BA0D-35AE-4B4F-8335-12ADB6D5E6A6"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14F89)
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr2upJBU9Arrg1TnkOKtshZ_MsWfJs_SXWrO4YV4NAA8ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 10:25:47 -0700
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <B3BBA297-88ED-4BD4-A02C-213EE554FECC@google.com>
References: <CAO42Z2wp72j-yOsR8C=iqS+dX14wLwthAtOTvD5ugj_NQ=NQag@mail.gmail.com> <8be34ef8-557f-652e-0d2f-f1a1e008bffd@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1706050827290.17963@uplift.swm.pp.se> <E2B77C58-B235-49D6-8130-0B41BE55899C@google.com> <CAAedzxrkbywKMmUaZ6-OCunXe1sw=q3+TNz278xZDmdsQm3xaw@mail.gmail.com> <93C6138E-A2EE-4005-8C16-05E2A2DEA661@google.com> <CAKD1Yr3+pHFhCwoL4vbQLDQ3PNGpijci8c7eZM=Gb0oTy9C0XA@mail.gmail.com> <8678F73D-2CCD-4781-9947-8C07182DFAF4@google.com> <CAKD1Yr2upJBU9Arrg1TnkOKtshZ_MsWfJs_SXWrO4YV4NAA8ag@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/GPnWywyhK-1NcqrmXbJlprHfcQo>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 17:25:51 -0000

> On Jun 8, 2017, at 04:35, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
> 
> If thread doesn't use RFC 4861, then it probably uses address registration? If so it's trivia[...]

It does not. The problem is not trivial.

You're invited to have a look at the Thread 1.1 mesh protocol. If you think you can devise a power conservative method for making a Thread 1.1 border router efficiently join a home Wi-fi network using IPv6 Neighbor Discovery, then I'm sure the Thread engineering team would be happy to consider your ideas.

—sent from my phone

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email