Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 03 June 2017 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE32129B5E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 13:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UmcfTHYqTrwP for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 13:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x229.google.com (mail-pg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05F971286B1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 13:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x229.google.com with SMTP id 8so20270101pgc.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 13:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OxUin8VLduHDgU/5HCEPEzjK0LCN/vZ6em49HYr0mWU=; b=nZDS+bJBAMdaU9Tl7yPs+nYwOVs04AXYHqC6m647J9GpxBf6X1xglNXRRO+DKgHx6S HoFDRWM+6hLwqIx9olFAayTHoXVC+laxKKP5G9Ik7HnyDYZuQVaFoLc9ySDiKbVrdBLZ NcZnqVO9VojP84peGnYd7+byBlv0kFwtEydhZ6vdsT1wI7Ww99F2W2G/hjgdtlUZAYX0 LYFKM5aRNab23qpGeuBT5FueBO7tuHDQPJpK9OUy503KdsH2cldX923CmGuuCKFiYlrH Jh1ss7hbEWDeUCY2ud5vGDLcZRNiMtOn+tQLALnOx64RdgncLEDbcMuq/2H9fdTSpI1u HmlA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OxUin8VLduHDgU/5HCEPEzjK0LCN/vZ6em49HYr0mWU=; b=J3gPLHAKgJv93n6S54VrC4MOWQNYdWkye7pdlJD8lGzETmnCREZxTVM4plelKtEkA1 swMegPaXIsYTgbrxK5xhhG8ONHd/WuCJ8RMjZpKQpzEZ3EB5KqoHxYXwqqvdbT5abB1D 4dmxuQcUmVFovfNWdMmNZwrz7AJjrRIOLVAQYkLE7YU2NOBXf9Q0yg2FMXe0LM2UPtSl jIPLzFTBLF+T9rYCbPKYxaHlOUmpgpkLYQG699H3HjZznsmo3DddvNvJmvJu8cBT2U6D UqUa3FMYxhPHRLCXBc4zv+nHiFdq0RZmQAQHfOfoKaqg3Fo/9Cgsu/MBdUXa78TzpZKy AHOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAxeoeNSO1Bxs4GQa9eDrLn51VvjcwbYaVe+8ohNQwGcLhst8wo C2yohuwfoiqHQPG2
X-Received: by 10.84.231.1 with SMTP id f1mr6569593plk.258.1496523367450; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 13:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] (96.23.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [123.255.23.96]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g10sm40986551pgr.18.2017.06.03.13.56.05 for <ipv6@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 03 Jun 2017 13:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)
To: ipv6@ietf.org
References: <CAO42Z2wp72j-yOsR8C=iqS+dX14wLwthAtOTvD5ugj_NQ=NQag@mail.gmail.com> <74616764-EF03-4AD3-BC59-B579B9FD2001@thehobsons.co.uk> <E6E71444-F344-448C-AE9F-2F506A1F8832@tzi.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <c6790369-4469-7ea3-0fb5-4e4540b65854@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 08:56:02 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E6E71444-F344-448C-AE9F-2F506A1F8832@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/s4vG3BqspGlqzGmQs3q_5yULVGk>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 20:56:10 -0000

On 04/06/2017 01:15, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Jun 3, 2017, at 12:45, Simon Hobson <linux@thehobsons.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> unlearning and relearning
> 
> Reminds me of the story where a kid learns how to roast a duck and the mother explains that to roast a duck, you have to cut off a bit at the ends before roasting.  Kid asked ma why, and she didn’t know; her grandma had always told her so.  Long story compressed, it turned out grand-grandma had an oven that was too short for a whole duck, and the cutting routine survived through the family even though today’s ovens are larger.
> 
> But the whole discussion here is backwards, because we stopped cutting our ducks a long time ago.
> Changing the established IPv6 operational practices so they look more like duck-cutting for IPv4 doesn’t make sense.

Indeed not. But we might well want to change IPv6 operational practices to meet future requirements, and having a magic boundary prevents that. Having a parameter n that can be modified at some point in the future gives us a more flexible duck.

BTW exactly the same story was in the NZ Herald newspaper a few days ago, but the victim was a leg of lamb.

    Brian