IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 03 June 2017 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096291286B1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 13:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TJqNEvmg00qL for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 13:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22a.google.com (mail-pf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B829129B5E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 13:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id n23so66075588pfb.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 13:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OeFQ1RUtCUQ3iD4LnSirV5QxQ2KReQSMqr+nrJBrY6o=; b=fwzJs+HO9QrU/bn2/THWLxgCA2o+ngNxtpJZ5YunKFUvm5OuYlbpYq46QqxyOE16K5 CArd73cYF1xV3fLuKMdJnyx+cDxX5CBlrTbXS/l2tk50lwidTnVL+nn1cq1YjuVQFfQI cVn8jdFFZIioHFm0uiGJHjAwDbQpxYHZ7ycTEy0PSDhpXPS2Gm+O4SYxy6PFZ4IPDYtA HAyp54xTKTUzKHZIHRIksOhJ85rBwpDMWunTdyElqXMZO3zQ/RD/u11Gf/h7SW7BwGQ8 9v+v3d97364CX2piGBeKiUmZAqMRezaNq7cgXzmIzuw03eDi4pQWlThgiG8PI6bPcio7 WkRQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OeFQ1RUtCUQ3iD4LnSirV5QxQ2KReQSMqr+nrJBrY6o=; b=tJFpTcZD8KR7M2z7vzvf9JdabG1nNEQhMfDvHDB0if4Npmwu/cO70e78QxF+xWNp53 NYfUBsiUrtShqha8adLaFCM5wq8zMn9bZunqNUapsK9llBDXMDrlHXbQXARTqOqIaO+f Ky0NhqZHxH1oXThqhQvYd5YiPB+vwXdG98GiT21jtjWh4Mnukig31iRQDGGzx8r40l5X RsyyHV/TE/hJfNqTW63ruwnsUHKE5WYXDJw6ALcCmBPViiw/ZyxDPq49depsHbrLrfEy H/ab4KnjJwpsTGp5yS4gbm6xBqrgKQfkhmGZYFSr4VS4clRYfxJFIomlb0Sn8s1S2B9c Y4KA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCPP7xvcWW5IgwgT+9B8MCBfr0+miGuVnZ5y//ckse7q564NLDN n2wmPZ2JCNfRO4JM
X-Received: by 10.84.217.134 with SMTP id p6mr6675143pli.192.1496523056735; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 13:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] (96.23.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [123.255.23.96]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g13sm10363297pgu.54.2017.06.03.13.50.55 for <ipv6@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 03 Jun 2017 13:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
To: ipv6@ietf.org
References: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local> <CALx6S34y1ZS95dD6Qv5A90RnKwh2NqC=VDaZ2vSq+zpo5+NpUg@mail.gmail.com> <5932DA16.9040008@foobar.org> <CALx6S35c8J5sn=VpGis-J3=yRzwXVMcntfn=Gv=tQ5k-v7r4gg@mail.gmail.com> <715E81C1-6A48-4507-8C50-C94D1D68B842@thehobsons.co.uk> <CALx6S36hu5-65Xg11ZyJwkh04epiQDjONudxRbvv-Psyh4ONZA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <1fe72c25-1d82-db19-d95a-66265f5614fd@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 08:50:52 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S36hu5-65Xg11ZyJwkh04epiQDjONudxRbvv-Psyh4ONZA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/uhHiM2ItdJj1TNa1pmxJ_vWkuUU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 20:50:59 -0000

On 04/06/2017 06:41, Tom Herbert wrote:
...
> 
> That's anecdotal. For every case like that, how many user devices are out
> there that don't even turn tethering ever and are only using one address,
> much less need 2**64 of them?

So that's an argument about delegating prefixes vs assigning addresses.
I don't see how it affects the question of whether the routing architecture
includes a magic barrier at /64. What the draft says is that there is no magic
barrier in the routing system. It isn't even news.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email