Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

otroan@employees.org Wed, 14 June 2017 09:35 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA574126CF9 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 02:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=employees.org; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=otroan@employees.org header.d=employees.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AbioyrLNyaOV for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 02:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esa01.kjsl.com (esa01.kjsl.com [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::87]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B7612717E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 02:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org ([198.137.202.74]) by esa01.kjsl.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Jun 2017 09:35:27 +0000
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0673CD788B; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 02:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h=from :message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to :cc:to:references; s=selector1; bh=CYlrAwiMNfqIPWvLnSoF1P3bgbc=; b= fHzMKVTEkXLsa3v9XlQDu2hs0kzC7/HnBFnSo4K3cK1Xvom2KPK15+MXmVQ38y0E aIGkLnfZ9PkOoTkIKeBiMU99fcM9KNN7CUkaO9IzRQIK8E6Nwtu1zoBC3Kf6LoY4 P2VGJzhGEtaDG0sQAKamCcEQaZp6XzOp+SYuQcdvoSc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h=from :message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to :cc:to:references; q=dns; s=selector1; b=VU/zODeDTSUTCHLxpKkHQkt GlMiEpiX91SLx1wzWU4qH+D/faWxssuuML7XC139SLYM7r2qGCj4TVsLEMGmDgax O6zeYMXzs9alqlKo5nBQZ6DKBk0bqw3DGDqjujedSToCwL+rvhxsyGK2kb98ewGm J/k2afvsu/30e3EVDxAw=
Received: from h.hanazo.no (unknown [173.38.220.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFA3BD788F; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 02:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by h.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95550D3E62E0; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:35:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: otroan@employees.org
Message-Id: <E61AFFF1-0354-41EE-8E11-50433B26BAF7@employees.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0B52C4A3-2C74-4B07-9894-D1BF48B09FF7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:35:23 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20170614092327.GB30896@gir.theapt.org>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: Peter Hessler <phessler@theapt.org>
References: <1B580CBB-B29D-4860-9EC8-BECD1D5E0006@employees.org> <4b2f5200-86a1-7711-e5ff-7436572be467@gmail.com> <E02C4C99-155A-4358-A845-F00F8BB071C1@employees.org> <b3ca5271-21b1-ab33-2dff-82735ebe9128@gmail.com> <235143da452c4ff4aec39a26ba918e7e@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <1489a50a-2616-f9ac-4109-16c595e15f90@gmail.com> <FA3032F9-F44B-45B4-9AFF-01EBC84F1448@employees.org> <b1c5c13d-ef69-ef30-546c-9178a2655caf@si6networks.com> <391c730c-fa75-7596-bb6b-383ea6583131@gmail.com> <0b57c999-b5df-8a44-e3fd-55cee628f3f3@si6networks.com> <20170614092327.GB30896@gir.theapt.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/NaKY43zoAftKGKQK6xZXbmaCN0o>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 09:35:32 -0000

Peter,

> :* Mandate fe80::/64 for link-local
> :* RECOMMENDED /64 for subnets
> :* Make SLAAC implementations flexible so that they could do SLAAC if a
> :non-64 PIO is advertised.
> 
> As someone who is on the "/64 is the devil" side, I am perfectly happy
> with the above.

Reason being?

Ole