IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Sun, 04 June 2017 11:55 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB5F128799 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 04:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id opusPwp_QKoC for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 04:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x236.google.com (mail-ua0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3016127058 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 04:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x236.google.com with SMTP id h39so9258012uaa.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 04:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=T6N7YlEhwhqs4r4SJeAZqhXe0wwS8innL5xa3Bon3hs=; b=QTdXnbKL4CjwKbVUf5VY8daGWn7iAsWPgYZtuEdc5F5eGK5Td/mpzPmzoPk9RC/an2 BpV7vyEs28X4B5+SgMatVlVlTUTVwG8+n7o9GNBy63Xc4o4sI6X3KRSSHnF6DQ61Kc9h bkUf+ab8nvY6zIlIeuiqW6UUWkV9xyr7pLF/cZgLajxZvhecAgN9GbvVF0Nef0GCw2U0 LWsUoc/Cn22zDN80VgRSG55/nTgY76U4kP0XD9qqQi35HMzkpLTorN6+sw/3oSZ0CH5U k4hn9Uw5/Hi8ZEKq+lsV9g62NUIRsIBBpAe5gEQKseCTqECQod8ykSSyTvD3RMWDilEn 7hgQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=T6N7YlEhwhqs4r4SJeAZqhXe0wwS8innL5xa3Bon3hs=; b=JJLUx4Ac+3M4Q0yI1oMS8hPGjdETq+b8Hg/z9odCro/nG1ipMoGXTFlUuhyjlWOmtQ ZCwxdV1e5fQGlRCQe0zT1fvrNpf7Z0aDFxk/TDJbRkqO2EyYspNnbFyBlqYRSB9VIlUR pzgv9uUvXCJs8Nd6Xn6axiouelbQgeuyNxQEUOKG5opdFpEBD3aRRb4wnL3qaPhxJUpo KhO6srOeUuJmyhGEJAhKMpVbYpAtpilj9QdrXf404dU6GZX56KteaskGUcneqZxPqazg 1XP5wKNXBbb4LRKzOZOmVkgBmeOTREDmqQNKx2fxVrgCPTsWUTwWLYWoYPF3YIdeYElC b1gQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBbW/nr6AZ3ablRz/E/D+KX8XGno6jtJQ/Tn+SDu0GSMeCp9FLf a0MJnyW75BGsPHajt+KbvjW+4mVbjPu6BkE=
X-Received: by 10.176.95.217 with SMTP id g25mr4638129uaj.71.1496577351690; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 04:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.168.138 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 04:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S36b_8z2_vi4T8ZNKs72v5rKAR9YpBWz+r+xb-J-yO4sfQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local> <CALx6S34y1ZS95dD6Qv5A90RnKwh2NqC=VDaZ2vSq+zpo5+NpUg@mail.gmail.com> <5932DA16.9040008@foobar.org> <CAKD1Yr3HkiAweix3fhxT2+9moj7eP2AGRtf7hESpOKihKMCUOg@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S36b_8z2_vi4T8ZNKs72v5rKAR9YpBWz+r+xb-J-yO4sfQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 20:55:30 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0s9TN3dYayhzKqX58yMC39vhGxcVi8+c3b2_VPNiyxwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Cc: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e082049606d91b80551211109"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/iADM7dJNjtl8vKfXZKAJNKA46XQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 11:55:54 -0000

On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> wrote:

> M bits for locator of physical device in mobile network
> N bits for identifier of physical device
> 128 - M - N bits for delegated addresses by the physical device
>
> I don't see a workable solution if device is assigned a /64. Am I
> missing something?
>

There is no workable solution if you want to assign 64 bits to the bus, 64
bits to the routing system, and M bits for mobility, unless M = 0.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email