IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com> Tue, 06 June 2017 07:53 UTC

Return-Path: <rogerj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D657129AA8 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 00:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5v0xRts5rOpW for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 00:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22a.google.com (mail-yw0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE514129490 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 00:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 63so52268680ywr.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=G/aC+6zvTHJ3YsGKofbFQi928i80P7cotinVb/foj+o=; b=rRlzrTzysAelqEvpgz1zmkZX60aPe1+dA5KMrf9nzt0GoNBM2Wjf4pptc5iSWv3uO3 k9S3qErWJXfwVSVB+sVV0VNlqp6KK631TV3UTSqApqB62PmmZdM9pjArC8zc5MoPQcCQ 0nnQxwgW4GmyaHRfGrKAbEg+RDTgCzaE56vtFrmeP80gDt/k6fd7azvAGKolX1rumQuw KZ/pTm4ky9v2LaAPSA9zJuwfRvO9l98hWLoYqSOIaBHbRiUDA742JSWL1wAY6ZfJ1z8L yRGZLasWHZaYv+OQ6U8ZQ6eRB7Ry00e1hj/ZaLl0P7kYIuTn9j6FtjhkTxrHVcnl4+M1 oPPQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=G/aC+6zvTHJ3YsGKofbFQi928i80P7cotinVb/foj+o=; b=gv9Xuz8n2iqNsySGWyhVa1tObmpgToaYEtLRTrTzWISRHJrYl7cu99y4xbeOG4V+Ui jRTAFnX/dAkbFxCaLUCw4LQ/4bjSc0V11H+iQPkxtpRmCoNAqJFm3KcOql4MMAeG7Ss8 cSQvUXmdYBadeu0GwEtEXB/8XsfK7cE/Eo2nZv0XOzM497oPTfbWErjzeRixD2jU16iw Dv++qSjD8UlSrTld52WHyMkhr0DQFAxCCjWuuIA3aRprhvxu5atGrmLQQ4udIwesKFG2 TqLjcst1qKowrxVg+5l7djkRmQ72WVDRQgdfhqJOPXXZhC5cw7Wxq6oGD02dB9qdZSv+ aA9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDEAwfJM/jzaX3fbhAAKAXbYnPg7ajuG7QJ49bso/uMu5uY8KF6 WXS+SddeQP7NzWWQD5CYQdT4kxqtFw==
X-Received: by 10.13.245.71 with SMTP id e68mr1632334ywf.269.1496735629156; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.13.246.7 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 00:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr1wmY3O9Uxe=KRxzCidpyhn3e0zSnikY0K6LK9ue4OzwA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local> <20170602141259.GD30896@gir.theapt.org> <CAKD1Yr0DtQYvCYLQexhXe_nhb5rjeyhnB4bCveqyO5Xbuwdg1A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKFn1SEdjhsQ3tKPZdbdfF4ArDzw-FZfjQT68gV55Fc-5vzBvw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3ppM0UF8HoN8PgS7F0iEmK26ebiuJK=tkAdZnuLWpkZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKFn1SHASt34ihJmGN0iRFQQzLTMspZfxXHgBjBatXXcRYF4cw@mail.gmail.com> <20170604093119.nt733rb3ymmjssww@Vurt.local> <m1dHTLx-0000DcC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <CAKD1Yr0ZZwRar6D-2bkXBKPYehqqW99+BMtDOjyovR8WDXKzxw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTjikAWutcenW8qn7OW8kPM9c_x_yDUy5vQxJmXKL85dg@mail.gmail.com> <91c3c0f4-eb8b-cdf7-b9c9-7d1eecb7fe64@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0_WR_TB+OC0U1Qt2h6WzUp9EGvrqC1ZKW2mwFeBd3bCQ@mail.gmail.com> <4021a559-5b6d-b3fb-19cd-afbe9041e8f2@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1wmY3O9Uxe=KRxzCidpyhn3e0zSnikY0K6LK9ue4OzwA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 09:53:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKFn1SFt_aURUbfoeod4BCRPn_wyUw3sGkJ1aTaW+Wzhd34eCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/UUoVj59cann0t_dJQsUe1A39PtM>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 07:53:51 -0000

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
<snip>

> I also suspect it's not the authors' goal. At least Randy and Job have
> clearly stated that what they want to do is run non-/64 prefixes on today's
> links (Ethernet, maybe wifi), not on some future link layer.

why shouldn't they? If it's manual configured it should work, ref the
last few emails, default 64 unless manual configured.
.... but yes the draft is horrible written/title if this is what the goal is.

And is it really needed in a new draft if we could get it into one of
the -bis documents...... ?



-- 

Roger Jorgensen
rogerj@gmail.com / roger@jorgensen.no

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email