IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

Peter Hessler <phessler@theapt.org> Sun, 04 June 2017 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <phessler@theapt.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4591294D8 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 05:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.008
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0McYELQkWenv for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 05:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gir.theapt.org (gir.theapt.org [81.209.183.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D21DE128792 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 05:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gir.theapt.org (unknown [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/0 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: phessler) by gir.theapt.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F20678985 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Jun 2017 14:48:30 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 14:48:29 +0200
From: Peter Hessler <phessler@theapt.org>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
Message-ID: <20170604124829.GI30896@gir.theapt.org>
References: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local> <CALx6S34y1ZS95dD6Qv5A90RnKwh2NqC=VDaZ2vSq+zpo5+NpUg@mail.gmail.com> <5932DA16.9040008@foobar.org> <CAKD1Yr3HkiAweix3fhxT2+9moj7eP2AGRtf7hESpOKihKMCUOg@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S36b_8z2_vi4T8ZNKs72v5rKAR9YpBWz+r+xb-J-yO4sfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0s9TN3dYayhzKqX58yMC39vhGxcVi8+c3b2_VPNiyxwQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr0s9TN3dYayhzKqX58yMC39vhGxcVi8+c3b2_VPNiyxwQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/yzUI1m4qXKc1IBJ74Zhje4eSlUQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 12:48:33 -0000

On 2017 Jun 04 (Sun) at 20:55:30 +0900 (+0900), Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
:On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> wrote:
:
:> M bits for locator of physical device in mobile network
:> N bits for identifier of physical device
:> 128 - M - N bits for delegated addresses by the physical device
:>
:> I don't see a workable solution if device is assigned a /64. Am I
:> missing something?
:>
:
:There is no workable solution if you want to assign 64 bits to the bus, 64
:bits to the routing system, and M bits for mobility, unless M = 0.

That's *exactly* why bus and routing MUST NOT require a specific size.


-- 
What is a magician but a practising theorist?
		-- Obi-Wan Kenobi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email