IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com> Sat, 03 June 2017 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <rogerj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B33A12EB36 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 10:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8qo7rRGIeqGs for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 10:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x22c.google.com (mail-yb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDA0A12EB35 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 10:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 132so24812247ybq.1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 10:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xAAeIRfIrmKl3R6o5SfHLFG89uEe+z7RfVHh0EvnLRM=; b=JN+G33npwCnkQFeZ5K9HhnyEeXosX9u2hjbEEpP6REl6ee6oXiyotHTss19ZtS/jF0 AHcT1Ix7RyyZ1DN1xWnOJ2/6qshELc5OHqGbB/Z8sa3IQMxjZOTWbYV9q89wJ2VzOFgU zG4Ht8teGy29uP8w7EYh030XInQV6Rx0g374XAbYbEImuvwi1Cel0S6VwuIiIYsiVTEI 9NYr7kEKZzC5Yo6WIVBbwBG9HHvwdqwZ3rzjCDlkeuTP+FD39PVKeh7tWgJnQCCuzAS8 VY4v8YQ0TkfdnXJ55GVCHvSTQA9RdtQZt3jNLPF+urqhVf6N9rmY3nWQZLxB3Vxf09xL SocQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=xAAeIRfIrmKl3R6o5SfHLFG89uEe+z7RfVHh0EvnLRM=; b=tabYsZFePPNSPB0Y5hp208kpvCL52NSS9Ica7hqSqUAXW3oe2nyWu2dpG3W/w7+OZv 4VOlx5u39xzMwEicgnFAFNPM/U2pTIK9qo/k2/oqNVnQaqc148rxMNBmtf6W3Fy9cBXg 3fdtxDH9zX4LA3PgniE8W9tNOQQZue0tk/4+q9CBMweGRK8lFCfdwnxCuZ0quDHMlQn1 FIr9vjlxfyqdIwCDxLMBtXAd0rbyEUKotcKHkrUpMVPLKde31g65ZRotvV7SOabw8Hrl AXoHVVLWGkMz6hApOXqZ+aCvgiowkJRi9/+q350CbtlaCE9BRPRs22jKEyYtwZ+TzLj1 wxCw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBIwa2jmZyTm8BwrwGmeqb2aTtxr9Yq4Kc8srLfo/yKRqWSqmQi pntATPDbyk0+2+HFSdBfbOjB7Sylih1v
X-Received: by 10.37.49.67 with SMTP id x64mr4099805ybx.217.1496511168153; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 10:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.13.246.7 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 10:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local>
References: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local>
From: Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 19:32:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKFn1SGwQug4tesCMFu4Rt1Ca9Z1+CYa7vvcRvYe1k3WLkg_Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/dA484u02IW892Slt0Se1BDdj_-M>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:32:50 -0000

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> wrote:
<snip>
> Abstract:
>    Over the history of IPv6, various classful address models have been
>    proposed, none of which has withstood the test of time.  The last
>    remnant of IPv6 classful addressing is a rigid network interface
>    identifier boundary at /64.  This document removes the fixed position
>    of that boundary for interface addressing.

what I find odd is that we over and over again are morphing IPv6 into IPv4
with just more IP adresses... can't we just rename it to IPv4+ and be
done with it?

Things like this ONLY hurt IPv6, yet again IETF can't agree on IPv6 so why
should we bother using it? But I guess the none technical side are a lost
case for most IETF'ers. Not to mention that we remove one of the thing
so many I've spoken to over the years think is great - the standard LAN
size. No more discussion on that.

either way, not support from me but doesn't really matter when all the
rest think it's a great idea. Think I'll use my time outside to fix the garden
rather than fighting this losing IPv6 cause.



-- 

Roger Jorgensen
rogerj@gmail.com / roger@jorgensen.no

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email