IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 13 June 2017 20:30 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B17F129C4A for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DgehgANmzpQZ for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x235.google.com (mail-pg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E5FC129AC7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x235.google.com with SMTP id f185so65568748pgc.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=oiXaf8W2E0B1WOBVo3az8aRJvLN7v+mjk6IUwcVYmPM=; b=XlapWW2+tVJFC4NJ277OncXpMtqlq2IiExFGvF3e50bnjxRvn/JiQ7TaIC9P1QB5F+ HZAGn0geP4z5tI1kRSKkkqPWhMuJROOjRWLg97jCYcZ29AR707U+8P56ZS1piSNVotFG pQTWIdzALu4DR1igqe1noJTn7zYa0yUm3vDa5hNLbf+7M6GhtB0eoAwnRye6UYuxhd8Q Gg2Ug0EdfQu8aH8aPlL9+qS7asa9pkT3ZTFgytTzBfUIbveEBkJbypUx5z5pq2rSWnxr ZB5IkCgubMrNcEtsU+QO73Ay5kFAWddRjR6Wvb/BMOGLRBZm9Nn8ZeFUFrb93NeJF5vA QumA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oiXaf8W2E0B1WOBVo3az8aRJvLN7v+mjk6IUwcVYmPM=; b=hGqV8CnfW3M35XSpszQ9MzIZQx2/ayrpy9NajeuYYpzJR8LP91PHez0X1XiBFspCqj jdRMUGnpDtnBNV9qNCcTo8u2tWZgc/D6I+Wva5vELy5Fmxmah73Gjx+6uc3FPjOntmu3 uKPJiV7ka9UrXPIhZRgGxmflI/eNh6MyEFYXq1ZrvVJljHKJTHXcWn9teeWQ9VF4OJaq OG5G0ETa/4KhlDC7BMvQQmymj7nYUzUdJ4I8sOxwEkY23O/3zoN1SsvBXD2grKPntH3v pGrFNrTLVWOJF3fRFTOeYCG7ARHvz/zt4iY+2Q0OqroQqzBJTkzAZHXBm1QqepUvAz2Y nPLA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOzlyMW1CQ5eoVVRlCZjsUK2nM8WuYRHPUMVnJe3o5kZ/w8USdFy AhHzCZvwNVy8nckl
X-Received: by 10.101.70.129 with SMTP id h1mr1346228pgr.50.1497385811626; Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([118.149.108.214]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w67sm25343837pfi.2.2017.06.13.13.30.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Cc: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local> <CAKD1Yr3ppM0UF8HoN8PgS7F0iEmK26ebiuJK=tkAdZnuLWpkZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKFn1SHASt34ihJmGN0iRFQQzLTMspZfxXHgBjBatXXcRYF4cw@mail.gmail.com> <20170604093119.nt733rb3ymmjssww@Vurt.local> <m1dHTLx-0000DcC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <CAKD1Yr0ZZwRar6D-2bkXBKPYehqqW99+BMtDOjyovR8WDXKzxw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTjikAWutcenW8qn7OW8kPM9c_x_yDUy5vQxJmXKL85dg@mail.gmail.com> <91c3c0f4-eb8b-cdf7-b9c9-7d1eecb7fe64@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0_WR_TB+OC0U1Qt2h6WzUp9EGvrqC1ZKW2mwFeBd3bCQ@mail.gmail.com> <4021a559-5b6d-b3fb-19cd-afbe9041e8f2@gmail.com> <34A29D4D-3670-40BC-B62E-85C4EABC55D5@employees.org> <426b1b86-575f-77e5-67d6-9b1fef55d074@gmail.com> <04CE008D-7A07-468B-A8AB-5A00C70C68AA@employees.org> <40843011-5365-5df9-4339-eda0815b7a2d@gmail.com> <0051e1f1-6c5b-303d-67fb-d5a059a65336@si6networks.com> <96eaf050-63b6-4804-81b7-77605820c2a3@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1ynPf4CF+OEkS60Bsmhon9TkDmDY2qP+tJjv7426_6pA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <a1f4d156-d8d5-6fbd-ace8-ace915373887@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 08:30:10 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr1ynPf4CF+OEkS60Bsmhon9TkDmDY2qP+tJjv7426_6pA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/xPXu9MevygV54h3kqyxySNwAW-0>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 20:30:14 -0000

On 13/06/2017 20:29, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
> brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>> Why does N need to be set on a per-link-type basis?
>>
>> It doesn't *need* to be. But SLAAC by design assumes that it is
>> set per link-type; that is architectural flexibility which is
>> removed by RFC4291, which IMHO is a bad message to send to the future.
>>
>> I think this is the main reason the IESG sent draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis
>> back to us
> 
> 
> You're not serious, are you?
> 
> The IESG sent back draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis because there was clear lack
> of consensus, not for any architectural reason.

Yes, because there was clear lack of consensus *about this point*.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email