Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> Tue, 06 June 2017 23:30 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F3A128961 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 16:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2zbRfYltrkSE for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 16:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 323EB128B93 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 16:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id m7so30701929wmg.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 16:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=O16n3twiAaogl6Cjov26rWjoXN+rGerhbrn2MeyQfFw=; b=CSlGEpLWHxIKfubgybz49UxR5JAOJviAB1Z85p0SAs0l1XsDolMb6RphkkY1krXhGU GhuHBbLcM3kBtJ5rTNEIA5WRsFt4g9oweKyiExS9Fl3MZk5J7kqpczB1toIg2pISMxOq auadCWHBgs9hPe9pYTuTKTWYqzUXlR6EylMEbnIP8BUWLjjICj9ln2QSMJHpjVi4TLst w5ZITVz3VoqEb5tjGWeGEUZHvr9tFgfONy1I7BejMp70zz2TpoqUe4GTkDV3jNJ/X70J 26o4jhyF0gpBTXFxgklJbl+FyxCDHIpsm2tzOIfVz03ejizNFINZHYuiVE69w64TVZ0q Y+vA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=O16n3twiAaogl6Cjov26rWjoXN+rGerhbrn2MeyQfFw=; b=N0FYBM/eq+lk0ar7jGDYNLccLowKkvguwfSRPbB662mmMEfguFXyAn6H2RU1bIH+dU YryLULa8DfHROsHGQMe6lRs7ZPHb7U1X6lFaZPxYaybUmN452Clj8jtAGILpviUcq7mq aFAQKETmO2vuJWfKCsirXz4p98VobVXOMhCepLi42119jjuDlzJO4HwteXNzG+OY/48L XZzYMXL1QRhCC4p9PrsO7FafzNhsxCbxBnmJtZNy01Vo7bZk4ii77uxD+kZH3XVYfhr4 3gbWBbUVEr1ltAaQdlXjHizzWD38TkVmB811sOdyIV+YqFvFSlHtX1Ujqi4ARjlndIzY P+LA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAhGsC1DOWu90afybxFdaHAbFajpz/CUuToxV38ZDi3ditGnGMg AfFT+8CIrImyLgeOeymWqCrhugZj/KVL
X-Received: by 10.28.54.13 with SMTP id d13mr7044064wma.124.1496791841605; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 16:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local> <20170602141259.GD30896@gir.theapt.org> <CAKD1Yr0DtQYvCYLQexhXe_nhb5rjeyhnB4bCveqyO5Xbuwdg1A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKFn1SEdjhsQ3tKPZdbdfF4ArDzw-FZfjQT68gV55Fc-5vzBvw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3ppM0UF8HoN8PgS7F0iEmK26ebiuJK=tkAdZnuLWpkZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKFn1SHASt34ihJmGN0iRFQQzLTMspZfxXHgBjBatXXcRYF4cw@mail.gmail.com> <20170604093119.nt733rb3ymmjssww@Vurt.local> <m1dHTLx-0000DcC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <CAKD1Yr0ZZwRar6D-2bkXBKPYehqqW99+BMtDOjyovR8WDXKzxw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTjikAWutcenW8qn7OW8kPM9c_x_yDUy5vQxJmXKL85dg@mail.gmail.com> <91c3c0f4-eb8b-cdf7-b9c9-7d1eecb7fe64@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0_WR_TB+OC0U1Qt2h6WzUp9EGvrqC1ZKW2mwFeBd3bCQ@mail.gmail.com> <4021a559-5b6d-b3fb-19cd-afbe9041e8f2@gmail.com> <CAAedzxppjnBhVAHF4L4B7WTtwxPGhpOv8ruXOhm=zGwjQ5-OsA@mail.gmail.com> <780257e6-749e-ad9b-4d7a-08e39f46fd1c@gmail.com> <89A69730-B9F3-49B4-942D-EB664A728BDD@employees.org> <dc950594-cb1a-3c36-4538-3b62f58806ed@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <dc950594-cb1a-3c36-4538-3b62f58806ed@gmail.com>
From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 23:30:30 +0000
Message-ID: <CACWOCC93jbqhw+Pigjx5CdHcAmubcx=nQLbOOtjOb81+u6MQow@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, otroan@employees.org
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143678e05a703055153025b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/6dPt0cgrTK8sMfql5-MBgGCcP7M>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 23:30:48 -0000

On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 at 16:28, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 07/06/2017 09:03, otroan@employees.org wrote:
> >>> The only thing meaningfully affected by removing 64bit IIDs...
> >>
> >> But that is exactly what the draft does *not* do. Nobody would
> >> change a single instruction in existing code as a result of this
> >> draft. (I agree with you that some O/S stacks may need fixing, but
> >> they already need fixing.)
> >
> > is this draft exactly:
> >
> >    IPv6 unicast routing is based on prefixes of any valid length up to
> >    128 [BCP198].  Interface Identifiers should be 64 bit long except
> >    when the addresses are manually configured, or by exceptions defined
> >    in standards track documents.  For example, [RFC6164] standardises
> >    127 bit prefixes on inter-router point-to-point links.  The rationale
> >    for using 64 bit Interface Identifiers can be found in [RFC7421]
> >
> > ?
>
> Yes. Put those words in 4291bis and I will be very happy. Oh ;-).



I recall a small but vocal group arguing fiercely against that text
adjustment, so here we are.

Kind regards,

Job