Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

sthaug@nethelp.no Wed, 14 June 2017 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <sthaug@nethelp.no>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD3C12762F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 06:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yv6nfUdx-W5r for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 06:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [IPv6:2001:8c0:9e04:500::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AD2126B71 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 06:20:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (bizet.nethelp.no [IPv6:2001:8c0:9e04:500::1]) by bizet.nethelp.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1976E6065; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:20:37 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:20:37 +0200
Message-Id: <20170614.152037.74746841.sthaug@nethelp.no>
To: marka@isc.org
Cc: phessler@theapt.org, ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: <20170614130649.E97607BB0491@rock.dv.isc.org>
References: <A7502902-245B-499B-916B-28630CD5A824@employees.org> <20170614095910.GE30896@gir.theapt.org> <20170614130649.E97607BB0491@rock.dv.isc.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/wIg15xnU-aDWQw0Cnn4HtwkxLIg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 13:20:41 -0000

> 2^64 address would have been enough to support the world using
> variable length subnets.  IPng evaluated this and decided that it
> was not a good idea as variable length subnets really are too
> complicated.  Instead IPng went initially with 128 bit addresses
> and, initially, /80 subnets so that we didn't have to deal with
> variable sized subnets.  This was later changed to /64 bit subnets
> to handle 64 bit mac addresses.

But since IPv6 *forwarding* is still based on longest prefix match,
plenty of people will need to learn the subtleties of how IPv6 is
*both* variable length *and* fixed size, at the same time. I don't
exactly have high hopes here...

Steinar Haug, AS2116