IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 15 June 2017 10:46 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9C2126B7E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 03:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.332
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.332 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nkE3GogTP8qd for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 03:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83B60129B28 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 03:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v5FAk613043525; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:46:06 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id BED33203F7E; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:46:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06B7203F75; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:46:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v5FAk6tE002126; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:46:06 +0200
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
To: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <E02C4C99-155A-4358-A845-F00F8BB071C1@employees.org> <b3ca5271-21b1-ab33-2dff-82735ebe9128@gmail.com> <235143da452c4ff4aec39a26ba918e7e@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <1489a50a-2616-f9ac-4109-16c595e15f90@gmail.com> <FA3032F9-F44B-45B4-9AFF-01EBC84F1448@employees.org> <b1c5c13d-ef69-ef30-546c-9178a2655caf@si6networks.com> <391c730c-fa75-7596-bb6b-383ea6583131@gmail.com> <0b57c999-b5df-8a44-e3fd-55cee628f3f3@si6networks.com> <20170614092327.GB30896@gir.theapt.org> <E61AFFF1-0354-41EE-8E11-50433B26BAF7@employees.org> <20170614094034.GC30896@gir.theapt.org> <A7502902-245B-499B-916B-28630CD5A824@employees.org> <6c4157da7039438981db0f4ba46df916@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAKD1Yr0dU+1rHo7LB2k7MOhJ+UOB5t7v11T2WYa+VtLnNC-7ag@mail.gmail.com> <242f3221-9040-6f14-6011-3f854bb00642@gmail.com> <CAAedzxojOUeP+_9JXDYp05TmxC2BBDiq2XyC7t1ueo4BtZ9n_w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <11ae3894-7a94-3509-7218-1e386163dda1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:46:06 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAedzxojOUeP+_9JXDYp05TmxC2BBDiq2XyC7t1ueo4BtZ9n_w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/72WbA9iePm2EqYrbNbs2_ZPLEIs>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:46:11 -0000


Le 15/06/2017 à 08:25, Erik Kline a écrit :
> 
> 
> On 15 June 2017 at 15:18, Alexandre Petrescu 
> <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>     Le 15/06/2017 à 03:00, Lorenzo Colitti a écrit :
> 
>         On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 2:36 AM, Manfredi, Albert E
>         <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com
>         <mailto:albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>
>         <mailto:albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com
>         <mailto:albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>>>
>         wrote:
> 
>         -----Original Message----- From: ipv6
>         [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
>         <mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>>]
>         On Behalf Of otroan@employees.org <mailto:otroan@employees.org>
>         <mailto:otroan@employees.org <mailto:otroan@employees.org>>
> 
>             What _problem_ does changing the 64 bit boundary solve for
>             _you_?
> 
> 
>         A category of problems, such as creating hotspots with
>         smartphones that have been allocated a single /64.
> 
> 
>         That works today on all major smartphone OSes.
> 
> 
>     If this refers to '64share' - that's an INFORMATIONAL way of of
>     working.  It has drawbacks.
> 
> 
> I think we should consider promoting 64share from informational to 
> proposed standard.  We have a not inconsiderable amount of experience 
> doing IPv6 tethering with it at this point.

I think that promotion will not work, because despite large experience 
it still does not scale to more.

On the contrary, I think Android and Apple IOS backers should promote 
DHCP-PD.

Alex

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email