IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 05 June 2017 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562261286D6 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 00:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0_8lEBhdwJWo for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 00:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x235.google.com (mail-vk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0400126D05 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 00:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id p62so27401776vkp.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EUWVYkMkX5OhQBIaNYNHuIoEjwFx8cX9Rv2qqUY8vjY=; b=ZewLwGgXa6W5K1UywjUzWp2TzEWFJ+kojkffc57VJsPUq4P/McIJdLF7kuOe8gMLuo zdfeEwtXL+QFLkL0/hqJN1ZwKS4mZSBisXNXun8gsgPxW7P4Nrts2mAlylAHDizCUWaD 5NRlWrlMaOMfTvCcEYETZXw2b3SECt8bDmxVSGdOPxnx7oPf7vCYpHRHJifhQYf40Un8 DPwUIpYQ4x4Os3yXG4NPSbyyQReLJJH3k9ZwXKy8ZJczzJ8xUhCbKoAbkkAogCp/KGOw WrLWh+hSITau9Wola0YMoci7CkpEtY5wTbGvl3Zq3JTSqp5a9qQSz93Zy5yYH/qXI3Ap +/Zg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EUWVYkMkX5OhQBIaNYNHuIoEjwFx8cX9Rv2qqUY8vjY=; b=uk7zjc4UHR/jxnUYosUQ6MrJOjYMrQaKF9UYo10sObdKsb0pISJ1BdycgF8CU9gmTu oY3yWWmyPBTuUfSWFraXZ9O+Gnkg8V55xLCMjdeYq3N85bxO3OAKtm7wFyUjwy/3EBjH GR59NoPcMRMVrF9EK6HaXL8qttUYbThafFVaRkqHnDLpmf0Ylspo+91j5gEABoaYShMX g9SVDZBSVRChloGJ4vJSngbj0qMPR+1cbxTTupvdtRGQQQuUTYwT0SSWq84Pg4eML4kK pmAkliiy70MirHDHV1PI5g/ZZUfMNsPpi1Tyk8nk64By5kyrurIcgOi+GpdoWfBB41cY 8tvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBJAiaUjKjNvynbl27m3oSeN0z/D/sY5oWJqGwRUini9MGgBHS8 +PoydD15e3lCwHgtkhL+a4SQcH98cCQr
X-Received: by 10.31.210.1 with SMTP id j1mr9075417vkg.144.1496648769941; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.12.139 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 00:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <91c3c0f4-eb8b-cdf7-b9c9-7d1eecb7fe64@gmail.com>
References: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local> <20170602141259.GD30896@gir.theapt.org> <CAKD1Yr0DtQYvCYLQexhXe_nhb5rjeyhnB4bCveqyO5Xbuwdg1A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKFn1SEdjhsQ3tKPZdbdfF4ArDzw-FZfjQT68gV55Fc-5vzBvw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3ppM0UF8HoN8PgS7F0iEmK26ebiuJK=tkAdZnuLWpkZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKFn1SHASt34ihJmGN0iRFQQzLTMspZfxXHgBjBatXXcRYF4cw@mail.gmail.com> <20170604093119.nt733rb3ymmjssww@Vurt.local> <m1dHTLx-0000DcC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <CAKD1Yr0ZZwRar6D-2bkXBKPYehqqW99+BMtDOjyovR8WDXKzxw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTjikAWutcenW8qn7OW8kPM9c_x_yDUy5vQxJmXKL85dg@mail.gmail.com> <91c3c0f4-eb8b-cdf7-b9c9-7d1eecb7fe64@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 16:45:48 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0_WR_TB+OC0U1Qt2h6WzUp9EGvrqC1ZKW2mwFeBd3bCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>, Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-4@u-1.phicoh.com>, IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114bc9e24a1758055131b27c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/JC2VKbXF9PqGl4HML_Gle7e2IpA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 07:46:12 -0000

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> None of that is the point. The point is to establish
> that routing is classless


Routing is already classless because BCP 198.


> and /64 is a parameter of specific addressing schemes.
>

It *is* a parameter. The parameter's value is 64 for all unicast addresses
except those starting with 000.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email