IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

Peter Hessler <phessler@theapt.org> Wed, 14 June 2017 09:23 UTC

Return-Path: <phessler@theapt.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C54126CF9 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 02:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.892
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.892 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kusZsI3L6dQM for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 02:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gir.theapt.org (gir.theapt.org [81.209.183.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C514126BF0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 02:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gir.theapt.org (unknown [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/0 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: phessler) by gir.theapt.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0ECD78931 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:23:28 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:23:27 +0200
From: Peter Hessler <phessler@theapt.org>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
Message-ID: <20170614092327.GB30896@gir.theapt.org>
References: <1B580CBB-B29D-4860-9EC8-BECD1D5E0006@employees.org> <4b2f5200-86a1-7711-e5ff-7436572be467@gmail.com> <E02C4C99-155A-4358-A845-F00F8BB071C1@employees.org> <b3ca5271-21b1-ab33-2dff-82735ebe9128@gmail.com> <235143da452c4ff4aec39a26ba918e7e@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <1489a50a-2616-f9ac-4109-16c595e15f90@gmail.com> <FA3032F9-F44B-45B4-9AFF-01EBC84F1448@employees.org> <b1c5c13d-ef69-ef30-546c-9178a2655caf@si6networks.com> <391c730c-fa75-7596-bb6b-383ea6583131@gmail.com> <0b57c999-b5df-8a44-e3fd-55cee628f3f3@si6networks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0b57c999-b5df-8a44-e3fd-55cee628f3f3@si6networks.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ZM15oIgqIW-hDxfw2Vi3Wj_m6Fw>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 09:23:32 -0000

On 2017 Jun 14 (Wed) at 12:09:11 +0300 (+0300), Fernando Gont wrote:
:Hi, Brian,
:
:* Mandate fe80::/64 for link-local
:* RECOMMENDED /64 for subnets
:* Make SLAAC implementations flexible so that they could do SLAAC if a
:non-64 PIO is advertised.

As someone who is on the "/64 is the devil" side, I am perfectly happy
with the above.


-- 
I only touch base with reality on an as-needed basis!
		-- Royal Floyd Mengot (Klaus)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email