IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

"Carlos M. Martinez" <carlosm3011@gmail.com> Fri, 09 June 2017 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740D1127F0E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1nJ81E7CGJQ7 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22d.google.com (mail-qt0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25ABC124234 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id c10so82149362qtd.1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 09:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0xCTMZuVajRtnoz4knWgvEClxOSn2KJl6KTzlxnOAoY=; b=YTzB0frb6RPv/9pwAFWrqN49y5+bEDskXkwsP+ENEsLnz9w8nbcAQoGWgdWQj8JhOw G7nZlF9oKJctOh4V3lOTNumFzPEfF77PptGpL4iIJ6TuO6uO8s1EH4VuVbHS1wrvJ6hc /hUazmb/o8G+iZrcsbUuCW0Gpapur/GiFNsnJpKL8CDw6mAJcUNUvA5exbxmZs9iQXp9 FDLGw4z9ivIYeLxWwl0kPSzG2760TzXhJvXPlfFWSfeJsBdY0exgVmGTaRPrYK4sxlWq A+0YWa5G3q8m9rrgrQuJtCvv4qg62x+YIvPXov+RL9Ztgf+Ly5hm+veWT/lZOrMYZ2H2 uKaw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0xCTMZuVajRtnoz4knWgvEClxOSn2KJl6KTzlxnOAoY=; b=DaR6Pn54QeL0gJuaKJK5FeccZZMkPsTqNRBmZN0C0IMY2Ofe8+kE+khLqSL5uFuNG7 Z2IdXXSbCCJGRe7FX5cP/7YvgiPhfv0AYxY6WU2I+IPXx0C/VKr/Gafa5iu0jAP5r73L K4Y/JgRZSgnAIMw4Z/pqVxsJgaZalswxJnezKkRMdt+NqTZLSvNayU4pWFyTpwn46gnr I9vPoNnlSPyXSrJyhuRukVXHSzA1krsq8w2u9nH9HAuZPbGKiO+85nbPeYnhfTyf0xHs 1RtcUYGzBvSwpu9cOX0tWOH6ge+vFuh3OBuS1KqP6GVDqdgHxfG8d5wC0cAI0FkPNrqQ rEgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxbdJ3ZLgl7tAFvXdSSJD+oAjSCicuwIAvMAjJiTgrLzW1RlFfY Sjjg2ixlm1CaHQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.111.134 with SMTP id k128mr4837797qkc.206.1497026575217; Fri, 09 Jun 2017 09:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [200.7.87.94] ([2001:13c7:7001:7000:7dfd:5f3f:c1e9:6f2e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o50sm1020936qto.55.2017.06.09.09.42.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Jun 2017 09:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
To: Peter Hessler <phessler@theapt.org>
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 13:42:50 -0300
Message-ID: <443740A7-D86F-4B23-9DC2-828373A5F3E5@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170604132200.GK30896@gir.theapt.org>
References: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local> <CALx6S34y1ZS95dD6Qv5A90RnKwh2NqC=VDaZ2vSq+zpo5+NpUg@mail.gmail.com> <5932DA16.9040008@foobar.org> <CAKD1Yr3HkiAweix3fhxT2+9moj7eP2AGRtf7hESpOKihKMCUOg@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S36b_8z2_vi4T8ZNKs72v5rKAR9YpBWz+r+xb-J-yO4sfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0s9TN3dYayhzKqX58yMC39vhGxcVi8+c3b2_VPNiyxwQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170604124829.GI30896@gir.theapt.org> <CAKD1Yr0g7F5Tq5AFw001dbyfVEbQNFRtrUy+YowdoKhLtnjS4w@mail.gmail.com> <20170604132200.GK30896@gir.theapt.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_42E956A2-A3F6-4AB9-803C-D1C226F54033_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/kcW-u4g-Ef8xax5vTErEKc4KPeQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 16:42:57 -0000

Hello all,

This has NOT been what we have been seeing in our measurements. In fact, 
for some of us it came as a bit of a surprise. We were looking into 
detecting IPv6 NAT in the wild.

Obviously all experiments are limited and can be skewed in various ways, 
but the data we got so far seems to indicate a prevalence of over 95% 
for IPv4 NAT but hardly over 0.6% for IPv6 NAT.

I am **very** interested in whatever concrete, specific evidence of IPv6 
NAT you may have since I´d like to contrast it against our experiment 
and see what we could be doing wrong.

Thank you!

/Carlos

On 4 Jun 2017, at 10:22, Peter Hessler wrote:

> Besides, *Lots of people are already deplyoing IPv6 NAT in the wild*.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email