Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Sun, 04 June 2017 01:35 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC63129553 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QmNdrEahX6dT for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22a.google.com (mail-vk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7C5412871F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id w1so54133592vkd.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 18:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VRtlRg6VSKBGD/JNo5f0d+1iKPgEPej3DgbUhUWetts=; b=Y4RU4GUjR4f2kNNnRmPiSdXyZ5FDXgFtxegRnQkO4+ViTl2PiDUuAWBwX/ZC4UGft/ 5atZIf2cbk+gpJVdbH371it/NAm2VaPTXIxyqTrQyGBvSgj0sUrqXqAwCtPPrmdOQ27G DC3Mfc3ZYDzVJbvVDTeemNI3/yNirrkYfxhhsIh/nZM79DBT9DzPhbbVC8gAmWKLzdYq tFd/BIIX8AkYh6Wxu9bVcsKEqOGHugXel1MlPyy5kQ5kLsq5rmXOqleyvoJpB54W0CfA rTaMk+2iDH+cxLdClCi7X1dW2nz6XBIdaVTMbHyj6KlzWXnFr20tH1qh0mERwKa+db+a 4bvA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VRtlRg6VSKBGD/JNo5f0d+1iKPgEPej3DgbUhUWetts=; b=GkaXAxFK4rVk0QoGu1UolScdumqjtrjlM/D+UOZP8Ww418wEmvU8QJmJmgPSIaBPzM Zl2mqxComp+LPQDCded3UVnmO/BDrQ29cgzgMDhdrm6rsYgnpnfNgSC/4BS1l0i7O9/9 PeKtryoN0KSrL0JdQvq6oOH0OcTscUz6iaDalctnPnB4NMxKY0s7kZHLS61dyDL/XtNL CMYX5rIg0mVO4sD6Yb19PXddmWKDiBXOyqclhlvFKNx5aj9KcuRa959pcHfZC/4aBA/S srx14jJReUMzygNuOzVyTI4EECrCYI5H2BFPOQxI+j+Xl5I0C4q5fLrmh9otqeqaZk5m dg3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCXhWMsIWX8s4uQ6Bo5+uqXLfRlNlbCCqdnQscwJnxb4HzJYtwv tTg8zrw1kuO3qAIEAU+BxeVTHXQo/Qf7Bk0=
X-Received: by 10.31.33.81 with SMTP id h78mr1115133vkh.29.1496540145680; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 18:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.168.138 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:35:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5932DA16.9040008@foobar.org>
References: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local> <CALx6S34y1ZS95dD6Qv5A90RnKwh2NqC=VDaZ2vSq+zpo5+NpUg@mail.gmail.com> <5932DA16.9040008@foobar.org>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 10:35:24 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3HkiAweix3fhxT2+9moj7eP2AGRtf7hESpOKihKMCUOg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c024cac6f9110551186750"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ciTM1wvdC57MolcM3RvOQMUQqXY>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 01:35:48 -0000

On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 12:47 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:

> let's say your device is assigned a /64, e.g. either on a mobile network
> or via PD.  Your device sits between upstream and downstream devices and
> passes traffic between upstream and downstream.
>

No, Tom wants to assign a device a /96 or a /104. He wants the network to
use the middle bits for mobility.