Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

james woodyatt <jhw@google.com> Tue, 06 June 2017 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58A2128A32 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RGOb0S7-Zgom for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x234.google.com (mail-pg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 409511242EA for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x234.google.com with SMTP id a70so30652705pge.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 12:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=JI8MsKw2FsfhjR7sRn71PR+0+e3WPOmIoO36PdIZV+I=; b=bnmB/MTiwumN3PahJVKl2SjRUgWva3P007UPuBrEleI32nUoAOdvuc7645J2jhiEI4 SXkLU5zALVLQiDiiCrskvSi5Ma5vnrYZYTt/d2gb4mSg0eonrH+Sw493/nC+viLhb7cp +yvc5UL8Th7rViI/wLpI9bGsRz2FIzt6eYGsysKacLuhxLut53XzBtdx9fPMU4IIlMYW wm6kCOHJuosZ2AEm/UoIccCtxo4hHtGlqotTj/hxHl3UNLwnmWpn9b9McJS3AFNvEpAb uZt5BU3XJK+O3KYbu9V1a4sKYnZzRJrw+xDO1i1/JwtBk1Tzz2eVcOyZDVlqM1oZIHfI KDhg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=JI8MsKw2FsfhjR7sRn71PR+0+e3WPOmIoO36PdIZV+I=; b=O8swE8ToZPMMNjaA467QyRrhvP76hemaB0T57YCfqHoqSt5IQX7nF0gTYwkN3wSrIv Dwjnp+h8uWMVudc2IPxC6730+89RM81uqEV+jetL14NbKQS3TbvWUr+HUlkYa90V7Oyf CD2DBr6Uu4TdELwTP4U/CShAul4rXLtcup+VjQZR3ujvYz8gpvM6Dq7VtCJvuYxLG8yN mT9EZXpyKrPObvtSAHbFaR/4WkEICCLGFBI0uHNTidy0mzaI5iCwUgU/NMy3ZsKLHUD3 QgqXjNhixmKx8vm89D4ZBeqQEp6ySLI3daJfbPTgR8g9MUZR7R7pR/R4lJFSYML7eUEP DKGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCstCXCJP60lFWwATvb5+byuG1rlUKTPmPSCV3LU20+/g5ViNkK eccp8QKzAYdAZE96spRrLg==
X-Received: by 10.98.30.129 with SMTP id e123mr27801589pfe.240.1496776904542; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 12:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620::10e7:10:b852:7159:721:8e69? ([2620:0:10e7:10:b852:7159:721:8e69]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x30sm41344597pge.23.2017.06.06.12.21.43 for <ipv6@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Jun 2017 12:21:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_12E05A0E-E020-45C8-9870-C9A5CBAC9190"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 12:22:05 -0700
References: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local> <CAJE_bqfuTbEm-8Uy5a+n85LCf7-pVGck8ccapGaCEqy1EpCFNQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: IPv6 IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqfuTbEm-8Uy5a+n85LCf7-pVGck8ccapGaCEqy1EpCFNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <A3F4B9D8-DD0A-4975-9600-21BFD6AEF5B9@google.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/xI6ZpkigkU0r9P6mezAVhtBngiU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 19:21:47 -0000

On Jun 6, 2017, at 12:06, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> wrote:
> 
> ...be clearer on the difference between on-link and SLAAC subnet prefixes. ...


I’m with Mr. Jinmei on this point. I really can’t make any sense of this draft because of how badly it conflates these two different concepts. I may find what the draft really proposes to do completely harmless. I may not. I can’t tell at this point.


--james woodyatt <jhw@google.com <mailto:jhw@google.com>>