Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

[Roger Jørgensen <[e-mail]>]

On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Job Snijders <[e-mail]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 10:55:59AM +0200, Roger Jørgensen wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Roger Jørgensen <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Please stop trying to make IPv6 be the same as IPv4. That will
>> >> > take away our ability to make the Internet better once IPv4 is
>> >> > gone.
>> >>
>> >> oh totaly agree, but it's already lost, the "operators" don't want to
>> >> move/change.
>> >
>> > But they *are* changing. For example: almost 20% of Google users
>> > these days come in over IPv6. Pretty much all of them are connected
>> > to networks that support SLAAC and use /64 prefixes. That's a huge
>> > number now matter how you look at it, and it's showing no signs of
>> > slowing down.
>>
>> look into the numbers, I assume there are one huge group missing
>> there, the enterprises and that's where the money, and damage will be
>> done.
>
> You talk about "damage", I think what you meant to say is "finally, the
> enterprise will deploy IPv6 too".

no, the questions is, is it really worth it?


>> If/when this draft goes through I am pretty sure I in 10-15years time
>> will come across something like this :
>
> Would you be so kind to also point out which stock options we should
> invest in and what horses to bet on?

that's low

-- 

Roger Jorgensen
[e-mail] / [e-mail]