IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> Fri, 02 June 2017 20:19 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01344127735 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W29srWkkNBrr for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22e.google.com (mail-wr0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26CF9127241 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id g76so12120376wrd.1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 13:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tYmIL4OtPUDuAYo+rkJoKY4H46KVR7q7GsR4XR15qIk=; b=PSTrMpZQbBBpiRGH8uIjUdK330kqkYGG3GA4F7yOdaPahjB73AoGNLq4Fvkj5zjxXl fknjAid9UQBzSGI6kk5FLDJ9ar+r8opYZsWndwjiX3ie2wiAeBvuIyHMRbw6ukL9PRD9 x+k/+A0ZPyjjHDWm9z9FRCH2JLPsU4mLgTcJr/ddXnnFjIVE03FnZ7ZvWcUQCDDgTcSu tS/Gs/Rw1OLWgvTWPp1vOVF0M4Z/N1C+rBV6BQYTuQUkpmBw2my6EaaHkKwf0e5/kvv9 avy/TGw3OHt2HIuDvkfxO/6+5x0yU7EICeUqRGSWo5QgrB9uPmM9lUHw/4VvymhkguPJ AjDA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tYmIL4OtPUDuAYo+rkJoKY4H46KVR7q7GsR4XR15qIk=; b=ezxgRLxqN9qYNiX4byVMFF/hIeHW9gKwa+4gGZqt+xt439R/Lp7tweKO8nVv+r7UFO mosUNe4CRteQMxTPW+6Ib7Qf/g1GG3WdpzfvDOVNBMoLY9cvOKdLAx66jT2IqfUY2ZUi SaNfgdWakTvAjffaJGJ/5q5bhq8NDFvZ8cBuieG+AzSZ/+IF9Z2Py5b3kKyv8GQicGZe PpT1hoCaLp1iLoIiwfdiPMlOjxjxKG3D4kJCQiHeyWm40WhlpUD7g0EKaSzw/kf+qD9p DZm7kRo7PAXGbPSVMEtKMZJ6DuTBOxbYc4kUdnR+fjOBJSJO11hqtooI4uxaRsikz1Dx qoMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCCG1pIhFruhRR6Yppf/NGt+0JJMqc8u7xTMy8UFh3jlfNq5SVV WuBGBDXVFMX0HD0FMmt24UGe5UsO0xTN
X-Received: by 10.223.131.33 with SMTP id 30mr3583650wrd.37.1496434790464; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 13:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local> <20170602141259.GD30896@gir.theapt.org> <CAKD1Yr0DtQYvCYLQexhXe_nhb5rjeyhnB4bCveqyO5Xbuwdg1A@mail.gmail.com> <20170602145655.msfjw35qhoev4sm2@Vurt.local> <CAKD1Yr3gqFgq3dxFaBEV++q5cgx1AHzFLGRJ50DYJjVE69C7iA@mail.gmail.com> <f2260ee557014429a1fef32de040547b@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <d62ce5e3ea0f486eb4c9d54609a86b24@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <04bdfdfe018145e6aedbaa62ed6cbfb0@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <78fe298cb5484d50a56cf6ed4ddafb54@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <6bba4c2b58964787860f2c7acf130959@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <f3ea6bf2d52b4179b1d9268dbcf67771@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <f3ea6bf2d52b4179b1d9268dbcf67771@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 20:19:39 +0000
Message-ID: <CACWOCC8C+4-dsdoW9aam2=zWqo36WaQQLddPvYgjUwukJAuavg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
To: "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>, "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0d0d221dc4d40550ffe0d8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/hvlJMuKwXXVi475UacTja2JbfLw>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 20:19:54 -0000

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 at 22:14, Templin, Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
wrote:

> Bert, I think you are either not reading or not understanding what I am
> writing.
> It must be the former, because what I am writing is not complicated.
>
> Another question that we would have to ask is what is the longest prefix
> that
> we should expect an ISP (or a core Internet router, for that matter) to
> carry
> in its routing tables? A /80? A /96?



Generally speaking most ISPs accept up to /48 from EBGP peers. Some
exceptions apply, for instance if a valid route6: object exists or the two
parties agreed beforehand to accept longer prefixes.

Perhaps this number changes over time. We'll see.

Kind regards,

Job

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email