Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> Sat, 03 June 2017 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <tom@herbertland.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB56129423 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 08:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=herbertland-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rcxMWJ8SFLy8 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 08:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CECD4120727 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 08:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id b84so44460050wmh.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 08:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=herbertland-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ENEMZdlEWYzeRzvgqpk8JHzeXxjlFBxFnzjhqE7rssU=; b=A0WSK6z2LUaJO8PIGm5fUjU8nkOxJZQ5F+xnU5HPGSIe7cpszzVBRYp76MPyRrRiBw azZeTCJliGIlaPT3AH938WquYh20lUBn1fOXUQSxkD0C86NsjJ7uoiyjFJUIc2Lxkpk1 qVomyp3LEkP3Nm2qQ8K8wm/+5CqIZUnKRaVSMk3jMBacx6cNdqhx7XVtpcYsKqmPMxzD cPG5W3hnqMwJ7jNb9sQ4mrDQpQX+PKf147eMm4pH9EAlpgq+fMDe8UBIll5u74ov0SUc 4ZDj2LmOFqYZxxJdZb4fD3EsTi801r1jiDPi2xlgPZPeQpY9nbi5mVOxmG+1EPU1BjEC +mPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ENEMZdlEWYzeRzvgqpk8JHzeXxjlFBxFnzjhqE7rssU=; b=FCx8qumovPsCaTzTu9laQ8u5eFQ4rIBbC1vlWGHBg8Za41U0A5GdovY3Z7mRHgTtEP aBoQMT1aKiuDlIsfuNm7xU2evbrXKDX3PriAkj0w03DwF7k4goUhS5yx/lHIiGhVGULz i6Oh5T6jZP/cKILUjcMiHTEqFUzdCyycRuhSrZkngWI4Xi6y8jnUjM5h56WBrliHBhKK dFAyGyvCVf2OTGhDXBHScoDnY9tf0Fm2BZYwNICVyKrGAm1rwH/BEczdi85o6giiVOCD VPqRD4hZkKrqG8Kyc8WE8WwKvKhiHgQAMmse/TTgKrXoFb1ksQY5/8L0mfjpQ6Lx3FiH Zp8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDHlD6seUkP2oKZRCHgh6AEkVPR2Nya7jPVo9aISZ4sAZ12F4NL RTU6nrpKfy33Je39PXpnrR7T1f/00RG5
X-Received: by 10.28.56.198 with SMTP id f189mr2554103wma.111.1496502263340; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 08:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.132.135 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 08:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local>
References: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local>
From: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 08:04:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CALx6S34y1ZS95dD6Qv5A90RnKwh2NqC=VDaZ2vSq+zpo5+NpUg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/wNB3-GerpOtM9T_gYQgclrlq1Oc>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 15:04:27 -0000

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> wrote:
> Hi Working Group,
>
> Please review the below.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Job
>
Job,

Thanks for the draft. I think the case will be bolstered with some
real examples as to how fixed /64 interface addressing has proven to
be problematic. Using identifier/locator split in addresses as I
mentioned is one example. I suspect there are more that could be
documented.

Tom

> ----- Forwarded message from internet-drafts@ietf.org -----
>
> Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 04:25:28 -0700
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Christopher Morrow <morrowc@google.com>,
>         Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, Nick Hilliard <nick@inex.ie>, Geoff Huston
>         <gih@apnic.net>, Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Chris Morrow
>         <morrowc@google.com>
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Randy Bush and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name:           draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6
> Revision:       00
> Title:          IPv6 is Classless
> Document date:  2017-05-22
> Group:          Individual Submission
> Pages:          7
> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6/
> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
> Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
>
>
> Abstract:
>    Over the history of IPv6, various classful address models have been
>    proposed, none of which has withstood the test of time.  The last
>    remnant of IPv6 classful addressing is a rigid network interface
>    identifier boundary at /64.  This document removes the fixed position
>    of that boundary for interface addressing.
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------