IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Sun, 04 June 2017 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5910C129483 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id er2lbnBClDrY for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x229.google.com (mail-ua0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B51E127F0E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x229.google.com with SMTP id x47so61447178uab.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 18:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mgtSFeh06PAORQPh5Uut1ALSmgieuJQnbi/qtVpEkVk=; b=V7kKpExhA38noe4IBGuMXQY7eQYXuQc6LMsLRgmSBE9bzOCp43aznksWcVTWtfa5sd 2+7Gw4v077uyfIeYAzuil3G4e57H0uSDFnKF6BxVIqtZ1De98xTEabgQTex0FgRKDXi/ oYUTJLalsmaRFMjIAxZdo7RzlIqXPxoep4psOr8eQ7YB+IYVljY4y7NvyyPA4wlkPtud pe9XEfINX7YqtgKi+FlfVjvJbJ3JOhrPp9nXvs7kc0RsoNW5IZwc65/vzbaycfWHLNCk 1s5ItTE0aQh4cuqYR2/0eOhmJiyWJ0xmkBSaO+TpDgoxAdF60mLZAPjM0zEJAflLyYp8 iHNw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mgtSFeh06PAORQPh5Uut1ALSmgieuJQnbi/qtVpEkVk=; b=A0eRcVXMijVfKO3VV3twAREbndxYL3j5HH+4hRrfxZRE6tugkIr/9fdJc5EY/A2LcC W9qbAxb3aGT2lCfh+t7fXqn+KDwi8eGBa18gmJQ+L5uILAmeucEUPROPZ+PWYuZF8U8r iZoea8VIZrbqnWKsbpSi85RMcxn2eyUguKEdXC0y9NColwTjO/kgYLd+hcDjpYw/5Gqp UNRDpIRRWNRE+80wc5I/UtmBWAQ9x/DU4Zcby+3gNXUVZ9sGk/xGN4xYHxwv8SpK79+b l2M3Rv6Dl5bN1jAzgu8W1EY0u7Z+5oh4qSknTEmXCyYBOFhSQPDlkMNZjRW/Sx0yvk2X C9Bg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAipzm6j+g16W/z5RCFRDq5n/LdwtWpXlMEVF8xPMABgnKT7ToF d1PR+KwmR5zp2IjCxiJwf+qgwN5d+DdpxyY=
X-Received: by 10.159.52.214 with SMTP id b22mr7489859uac.93.1496539282290; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 18:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.168.138 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <723E4B25-B932-412D-8369-448703DAA21A@thehobsons.co.uk>
References: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local> <20170602141259.GD30896@gir.theapt.org> <CAKD1Yr0DtQYvCYLQexhXe_nhb5rjeyhnB4bCveqyO5Xbuwdg1A@mail.gmail.com> <20170602145655.msfjw35qhoev4sm2@Vurt.local> <CAKD1Yr3gqFgq3dxFaBEV++q5cgx1AHzFLGRJ50DYJjVE69C7iA@mail.gmail.com> <f2260ee557014429a1fef32de040547b@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <C6696427-E3BD-4C5A-9A2F-A979CE063C45@google.com> <CAKD1Yr1zvyVbcQjFNDV7SzcLsG2igpSg+jst4AR9KbYstPWjTg@mail.gmail.com> <723E4B25-B932-412D-8369-448703DAA21A@thehobsons.co.uk>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 10:21:00 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr115UeYbqRA_X6Q=5yo13dgSxT5V_AnpF6wgk7DPgDbZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
To: Simon Hobson <linux@thehobsons.co.uk>
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e79765099630551183452"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/1fAv4rTlA0RNvCKN2njx12_9kbk>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 01:21:24 -0000

On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Simon Hobson <linux@thehobsons.co.uk> wrote:

> BUT, I cannot see the logic behind your earlier comment that DHCP makes
> NAT inevitable for IPv6.
>

The answers are in RFC 7934,

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email