Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

[Job Snijders <[e-mail]>]

On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 10:55:59AM +0200, Roger Jørgensen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Roger Jørgensen <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Please stop trying to make IPv6 be the same as IPv4. That will
> >> > take away our ability to make the Internet better once IPv4 is
> >> > gone.
> >>
> >> oh totaly agree, but it's already lost, the "operators" don't want to
> >> move/change.
> >
> > But they *are* changing. For example: almost 20% of Google users
> > these days come in over IPv6. Pretty much all of them are connected
> > to networks that support SLAAC and use /64 prefixes. That's a huge
> > number now matter how you look at it, and it's showing no signs of
> > slowing down.
> 
> look into the numbers, I assume there are one huge group missing
> there, the enterprises and that's where the money, and damage will be
> done.

You talk about "damage", I think what you meant to say is "finally, the
enterprise will deploy IPv6 too".

> If/when this draft goes through I am pretty sure I in 10-15years time
> will come across something like this :

Would you be so kind to also point out which stock options we should
invest in and what horses to bet on?

Kind regards,

Job