Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

[Roger Jørgensen <[e-mail]>]

On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <[e-mail]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Roger Jørgensen <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> > Please stop trying to make IPv6 be the same as IPv4. That will take away
>> > our
>> > ability to make the Internet better once IPv4 is gone.
>>
>> oh totaly agree, but it's already lost, the "operators" don't want to
>> move/change.
>
>
> But they *are* changing. For example: almost 20% of Google users these days
> come in over IPv6. Pretty much all of them are connected to networks that
> support SLAAC and use /64 prefixes. That's a huge number now matter how you
> look at it, and it's showing no signs of slowing down.

look into the numbers, I assume there are one huge group missing there,
the enterprises and that's where the money, and damage will be done.



If/when this draft goes through I am pretty sure I in 10-15years time will come
across something like this :

My device provided by the enterprise will have a /122 and when asking why
the security department will say something along the line because there are X
devices allowed on that segment and we provide them all. And since X match
with /122 we just configure them static on each device.
If I am lucky enough that it's global address space, but most likely it will
be ULA with NAT, because NAT provide security......

No real security, just shortsighted missguided assumptions on howto
provide "security."

this draft don't consider the none-technical side where the real damage
is coming. None will bother to look into why they should use a /64,
they will just hear "oh, IPv6 is classless so we can use whatever we
want", and they will go down that road.



-- 

Roger Jorgensen
[e-mail] / [e-mail]