IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Sat, 03 June 2017 04:35 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8931270FC for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 21:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wQ0DgKbIdndu for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 21:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22c.google.com (mail-ua0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F37A129C37 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 21:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id j17so54417194uag.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 21:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PTZG4eJdO/FW1ciAcncD8qog4Ruz0daqd4Y8/PQFr4A=; b=P1S+R6yTyn9IIJtuIRQmxI5k4j5Q8zK4TI8o3QAH4NQmi+vbidpUpOY5rw5Tmjeq5y +R84fZ8uCENoMO4Rdc/x98Nl2oF7SKj1IQcNrwTMnlzlWqCjIWh0wR2iVbEcRpkW9Ghl BQe49ATG7nYIsPJ25tR45OzHoiS2vC1K8uwo7eTaMIcCya82BrLRIm7eZtw1lslOIE4l SXyHlGFFmn4VvfdIxr9cwzm4xu9LcgfCy6GbkPzl7o7QX49+3K7NFiivugDi0vF2BpHK SESoGou3Y3+P4jWk6j4QA/RrSNDR1QLJQUnRf2iPv4nhd9ypGerHfq1Xi2/6rmrf5PrM LBXw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PTZG4eJdO/FW1ciAcncD8qog4Ruz0daqd4Y8/PQFr4A=; b=UG/V6q2WLsr+6aqducZHBfN8t0R5AALm4QUmvhFwD/JaoJnfRX08U7amg8vA3n4FOT KtMc3BsYNlYjtyyvqEjWfe3Dnu3zS/Hr9zsy0bV87LXvPAVoHnl4y2ZNbMpjuh7I/7Ep 1ceVRREcpuzL6FbN32GoNHnGlbcfFZrgbwIoDtyTvfWqwHVTDlk3nH2563A4VNFU5sbE TYPHNrdkESz8RhT35yXJTJvhzkkLu4Vxs+cy3rG4IYodHcMmQl01zXV4LeBBhKAcE20X z+71q0X66yWsS9Fb/3ioBOm+SXAayP84y3kATsbToIueVlJ7RoRSfRo2dxTa1sBzWDQ0 YizA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBT7sb1EGh9+yKquDN7V8Gw0mj/i9El3b2FxLLUNyYuFLWZHjj+ 3wEZ8XArBOwGrLucVe89Bw9FeDUa+jSd
X-Received: by 10.176.83.16 with SMTP id x16mr5969162uax.11.1496464500549; Fri, 02 Jun 2017 21:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.168.138 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 21:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.168.138 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jun 2017 21:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2c496b044bc941bda1abd8f5662c5224@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <20170602141112.x64nleqclygz7dwd@Vurt.local> <20170602141259.GD30896@gir.theapt.org> <CAKD1Yr0DtQYvCYLQexhXe_nhb5rjeyhnB4bCveqyO5Xbuwdg1A@mail.gmail.com> <20170602145655.msfjw35qhoev4sm2@Vurt.local> <CAKD1Yr3gqFgq3dxFaBEV++q5cgx1AHzFLGRJ50DYJjVE69C7iA@mail.gmail.com> <f2260ee557014429a1fef32de040547b@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com> <C6696427-E3BD-4C5A-9A2F-A979CE063C45@google.com> <2c496b044bc941bda1abd8f5662c5224@XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 13:34:59 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3aiWcaWm-NY=TN+eWGrATmr3kvKdVc7MmrCWiFQ+oENg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00
To: "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>, James Woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c18f1acf9b5c5055106caa4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/MrKgU0qESlMgfFaI0QX19PcQ2e8>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 04:35:03 -0000

On Jun 3, 2017 04:31, "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>
wrote:

Complete agreement. It's democratization. Users can do their own thing.


Actually they can't. NAT doesn't extend the network, it just provides a
crippled, stripped-down version of it.

guarantees everyone a /48, which would then further put to the lie the idea
of this super vast IPv6 address space.


You seem not to know that there is in fact plenty of space to do that. See
the calculations in RFC 3177.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email