IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 08 June 2017 11:32 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6D312EAA5 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 04:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GXtnfcn3Q_Zl for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 04:32:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1A1D12EAA7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 04:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 54B08A5; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 13:32:01 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1496921521; bh=2mC7vCtVj3CVisN7KoKNI2Sh9rPVDbl4CvHsE3Ot7ck=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Xx095teES8RhN0ojLLb+pO/Ylwbu+XiNQ5zezJvsLmZ5o0NJq6AvrBT1ulM8D8OcT b2NUi6vqqnSUguaS2GpdadpAZXcSteueJbFsQtkrIN8DCie/5i/CpIgzbBRyyveRFg 7k2ysg1P+Rrs8/fe1VjyF+WTAUMqM4hJtmEHuUFg=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5EFA4; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 13:32:01 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 13:32:01 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)
In-Reply-To: <8678F73D-2CCD-4781-9947-8C07182DFAF4@google.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1706081329100.17963@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CAO42Z2wp72j-yOsR8C=iqS+dX14wLwthAtOTvD5ugj_NQ=NQag@mail.gmail.com> <8be34ef8-557f-652e-0d2f-f1a1e008bffd@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1706050827290.17963@uplift.swm.pp.se> <E2B77C58-B235-49D6-8130-0B41BE55899C@google.com> <CAAedzxrkbywKMmUaZ6-OCunXe1sw=q3+TNz278xZDmdsQm3xaw@mail.gmail.com> <93C6138E-A2EE-4005-8C16-05E2A2DEA661@google.com> <CAKD1Yr3+pHFhCwoL4vbQLDQ3PNGpijci8c7eZM=Gb0oTy9C0XA@mail.gmail.com> <8678F73D-2CCD-4781-9947-8C07182DFAF4@google.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-137064504-1493922853-1496921521=:17963"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ubYbIubodIBtKNuOY0lXutTPrR4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:32:06 -0000

On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, james woodyatt wrote:

> mesh. Use of IPv6/NAT allows the border router to make an entire 
> Thread™ mesh reach the public Internet via the one stable IPv6 address 
> that is reliably available on all residential networks with IPv6 
> providers.

Why does it have to be just one? Why can't it be one per thread device, so 
you can do 1:1 NAT and not PAT?

I know we have discussed this before. Why was DHCPv6-PD out of scope? 
Because you needed stable addresses internally? Did you decide to use ULA?

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email