IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 08 June 2017 05:26 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5169A127444 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 22:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C_bzZinVLUu3 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 22:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x244.google.com (mail-pf0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DABB8124D6C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 22:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x244.google.com with SMTP id u26so3840843pfd.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 22:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=/JKuBBj5LwwO9H42aVagMv8ehiafwJfMvZrSibWN+A8=; b=QeHGhdaRzQdOonEjg3Z9XCjHcgF+tG28eVbWpN1qkHT24D6FsyzBZ1qtfjddN++521 ruf1cZxRjRd5topGdAvkOCYfEbyLKAuxd8DNHlfVD74dIjNfnFqtVdqiV/O+PClQFWqO /vbL/MkZMqeOOlxxeuD2IG6JaKz8nWIO7Tsx9AJ3HUeeYdEkOGKaDrXTawIyHgZ4CAXR xZh/KtGeZIbVzX4F3KFOge/lRIO2ZyueE1ye+aM6IxO/AZLhulSA/y8FSk7QO2BKzvDm PW6+SMkp4iZitTby2ljwzx96GzrCFfELlTKhc4SVWgYuofTm2ZlhUHKnP9E369qjqklx 8LFQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=/JKuBBj5LwwO9H42aVagMv8ehiafwJfMvZrSibWN+A8=; b=Z3jakimDZlZ7ndlExlK3+UusLuqOeFSMUA3PvwFn9JRjydwIEHy68yx56nXGyiz9Cg L7d/HXNh3NL1OSIxxa6/oqinGvwjy1qudh0Q5ahC4r6DAuj4BX3ggMinynkhAvU6DehE IYWz79U55mXTKe9F6F9ZwToPMowjRXw9UxthnLgLEsKIp+nmm0MQ1bSNDs2lnbmOr/k+ rQOVa/LbOKwYVL2qLFKIC5lsDCysWwrsqCzdRa3nxeoRHhs/WnC4ZaDeiJSGG2jZQdpM Y87GnbxsOk+YiACvvVieuP557BFfHinNx8GMujbxEXHtz9EEfDswuJM9vQxO7XnF+QdG 2IdQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCqp2N/yh4CmhbgHVB2+nfMOhz9cpzQC/mtCiwaTKt6ClyP05cb Y0zkU1fkYANP9bBIfEA=
X-Received: by 10.84.217.158 with SMTP id p30mr32653129pli.211.1496899605552; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 22:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.12] (ip184-189-217-181.sb.sd.cox.net. [184.189.217.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w3sm6179980pfw.19.2017.06.07.22.26.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Jun 2017 22:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <A3E25B71-9EC6-4E1B-91BC-FE36388676CB@google.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 22:26:43 -0700
Cc: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <73A42828-9F55-4B01-9C00-608221B66EA3@gmail.com>
References: <CAO42Z2wp72j-yOsR8C=iqS+dX14wLwthAtOTvD5ugj_NQ=NQag@mail.gmail.com> <8be34ef8-557f-652e-0d2f-f1a1e008bffd@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1706050827290.17963@uplift.swm.pp.se> <E2B77C58-B235-49D6-8130-0B41BE55899C@google.com> <CAAedzxrkbywKMmUaZ6-OCunXe1sw=q3+TNz278xZDmdsQm3xaw@mail.gmail.com> <93C6138E-A2EE-4005-8C16-05E2A2DEA661@google.com> <CAKD1Yr3+pHFhCwoL4vbQLDQ3PNGpijci8c7eZM=Gb0oTy9C0XA@mail.gmail.com> <8678F73D-2CCD-4781-9947-8C07182DFAF4@google.com> <EF9AC09C-5262-4DFB-AA4D-AE95EF81293C@gmail.com> <CB328974-E401-4B62-A408-1814183E0010@google.com> <8C792BA9-3FBA-46F3-9CBE-E82E4B93BEFC@google.com> <CAD6AjGSvaAGydOjZ-LYA8=DR2pOjmUrYAGN0kVdC2aKb3jvx_A@mail.gmail.com> <A3E25B71-9EC6-4E1B-91BC-FE36388676CB@google.com>
To: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/EL-Jh9-YLv_1_8VVE8mlBqYFFUs>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 05:26:48 -0000

On Jun 7, 2017, at 4:42 PM, james woodyatt <jhw@google.com> wrote:
> As far as I know, nobody associated with Thread™ apart from me is even listening to IETF much less offering anything to say. And the only thing I’m saying is that IETF should stop pretending that IPv6/NAT in end site addressing plans is preventable. It’s inevitable.

That's not LACNIC's experience. They have been testing to see what the real story is - put an ad in a web page that accesses a STUN server, and reports whether the addresses are the same or different. What they find is that, in Latin America, IPv4 hosts have a 94% probability of being behind a NAT, but IPv6 hosts have only a 0.6% probability.

Just saying... Last I checked data trumps opinion.

https://natmeter.labs.lacnic.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email