IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 07 June 2017 08:53 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8584712EB27 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 01:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ib_13B32nkLU for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 01:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22e.google.com (mail-ua0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBA2B12EB2B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 01:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id h39so3001555uaa.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 01:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=q9l6MGX7LHOWo4jh8VLMIVJzvafbEjCBBPOnyp64eFs=; b=NbvDzO6Qty416MmrY8oPubEDdTGln3319PfOeeRJP1IAKjqOGxW4nfCKM3iZlNST2l ord4WuPEQsAU9lvVQw4GCEfXh01lJ3Jcs5/U8cTAhZ0FwTh6VWw6Ucj6AQzi+eZ9i1GE fZ8dLXO1CQ1cH5R0pHfQrXzo3CJz+9c5Rd0w5LDbl/T8+YmDmkrodr1DEapsMjUVqeMO QlmMvUjzfZmrd1Uknk5Wb5H8ZyVj/YKyOf1SNyiVeDtAMo1lfrGsMX/jrJX3fu0I/Fr4 V+IuQZaZL3RodOkmO6Cz/SceV3YxdNuKsNyTuVSTni5wiIXj9c+VAGNgrAJLBwfHxY7i YmOQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=q9l6MGX7LHOWo4jh8VLMIVJzvafbEjCBBPOnyp64eFs=; b=B6Oz79daOqSn/X456Pdis3uYyrqvDVFlJ3lAAhfurJ57SGj1Gi4hX8jYb76tR6/sHv 8tBg6A6vVn6K3BzI9q4iF7nF5OaQr8sUkldVxkYwVuvrONMzvA5A18EhRwr/U+c2uSwp HoGiA/iR/an7UkvXxOS1juxe/XqddVXIMOlnijRLLTuU5SWkpyWXptpQv10xrxyH3Ceu StosTmyeP0F72fE0KoHDbubx8rWcDcHU2FujaPSnRVf4lquZM2db1akk1GT3VQAaujaR ngn2G3oXEMrCfEgAHHaOBhV/OhRDNG4lzr2Z+5csl/Bx9Sp2PxSnO5C1bWz5v/ZqlsgJ r/Kw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDN2Bm28D0m+5vNEeJg6Kx3hdWLAfcMWztdwcj50DfRpU9fVa9g DL3neiSbRfHdTHrTHbyHRLvKWH92erx1
X-Received: by 10.176.95.217 with SMTP id g25mr12065073uaj.71.1496825630846; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 01:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.12.139 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 01:53:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <93C6138E-A2EE-4005-8C16-05E2A2DEA661@google.com>
References: <CAO42Z2wp72j-yOsR8C=iqS+dX14wLwthAtOTvD5ugj_NQ=NQag@mail.gmail.com> <8be34ef8-557f-652e-0d2f-f1a1e008bffd@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1706050827290.17963@uplift.swm.pp.se> <E2B77C58-B235-49D6-8130-0B41BE55899C@google.com> <CAAedzxrkbywKMmUaZ6-OCunXe1sw=q3+TNz278xZDmdsQm3xaw@mail.gmail.com> <93C6138E-A2EE-4005-8C16-05E2A2DEA661@google.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 17:53:30 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3+pHFhCwoL4vbQLDQ3PNGpijci8c7eZM=Gb0oTy9C0XA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)
To: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
Cc: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0820496004c34605515ae0e9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/tOfgdUut1Br7xrRr8oWIS5bk6b8>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 08:53:59 -0000

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 4:06 AM, james woodyatt <jhw@google.com> wrote:
>
> p1. Power conservative ND Proxy isn’t possible with Thread™ 1.1 (and
> earlier) networks. It may never be possible in future versions of Thread™.
>

Can you explain to us why it doesn't work? One might naively think that if
the BR is doing NAT for hosts behind it, it has to process a similar
packets as it would have to process if it were doing ND.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email