IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)

james woodyatt <jhw@google.com> Wed, 07 June 2017 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEE1129B38 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 13:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Fc7PRQz7Jka for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 13:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22d.google.com (mail-pf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7237129AEE for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 13:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 9so9334233pfj.1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 13:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=mJCYq0dIDadBZzjpfHekmwoWNWVbM4nnnzkWgAQYxhI=; b=Pee365Hm/MunpWdyycbdGEU5S7tZMfKNnoWJOTy1KQrltBqFPyCVmonq//D9U1cWIL 5USrQwjA2ozb2VOzpVhAmQ7fuw2XxXQhsXy8aEeEz9BPJXR5ZyQTwE9/keN5QdTW75AO Js2dgdXAdi/DYIWmcNI8AjNc4GnrcePmlWs+2CcddKE49f3Sq/yUDSj379Kjvtgp2s4Q k8SRPsztYSLE68ndHPbo9TWv1M0COI4AYtsp4TikhW6CafcIaLQvFJUN+JjkNcvBxBt6 7G28XfEE1sAhTjGb/IARqSqqCSeuZ4QFy13fdbpsDsDNopJHP5D+It8SVkQ8AmQPHkyw Icyw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=mJCYq0dIDadBZzjpfHekmwoWNWVbM4nnnzkWgAQYxhI=; b=Jboct/LtrtjS7yFn0pfKhNVr06vFPVbqAj0rX33yE6NuMcH4yRQzX8qJzSC4g4W/20 vesjh6I6nuI/QHzueFzxIk9l6lr0Icw8FQMRB8xmecGAR5XRh8X2L0yivuNOW9tZwUhd nyn2DlLpPXRB0P6SVBCbPtas1Lfm+FL7+/WjeqU6agKl3qs5KakZWO0gFSylb/cBCcza KVpxkvAw7dxpHZ6W3JjNIfY5O4holBtMelz1ntn2Dt+jyjMsKAfxznNuo3oW6qmP4jJI WVJwvSKfIjUOh9gm24mk0Ysd8Vq5CLKUmSojgSg/mSez2ARXZ+JsilxEkDL6FAyjdaF2 2ksw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDCZ3cy2uYMuazeawXyZ8se2RWVYUF5yPM+XWAfQhdseU4hJEVn mU0eeLBC3xheyaXlP1A0bA==
X-Received: by 10.99.66.5 with SMTP id p5mr33970905pga.107.1496866883231; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 13:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620::10e7:10:c04e:499a:a99:a8ba? ([2620:0:10e7:10:c04e:499a:a99:a8ba]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x73sm5478519pfa.71.2017.06.07.13.21.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Jun 2017 13:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
Message-Id: <CB328974-E401-4B62-A408-1814183E0010@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D56C6F2B-E672-4460-8F7A-94C73F1164AE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 13:21:21 -0700
In-Reply-To: <EF9AC09C-5262-4DFB-AA4D-AE95EF81293C@gmail.com>
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CAO42Z2wp72j-yOsR8C=iqS+dX14wLwthAtOTvD5ugj_NQ=NQag@mail.gmail.com> <8be34ef8-557f-652e-0d2f-f1a1e008bffd@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1706050827290.17963@uplift.swm.pp.se> <E2B77C58-B235-49D6-8130-0B41BE55899C@google.com> <CAAedzxrkbywKMmUaZ6-OCunXe1sw=q3+TNz278xZDmdsQm3xaw@mail.gmail.com> <93C6138E-A2EE-4005-8C16-05E2A2DEA661@google.com> <CAKD1Yr3+pHFhCwoL4vbQLDQ3PNGpijci8c7eZM=Gb0oTy9C0XA@mail.gmail.com> <8678F73D-2CCD-4781-9947-8C07182DFAF4@google.com> <EF9AC09C-5262-4DFB-AA4D-AE95EF81293C@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/I381rfa2A5XvKc7t5ABxBxylzYA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 20:21:26 -0000

On Jun 7, 2017, at 12:41, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thread is one adaptation of 6LowPAN etc; OCF (formerly OIC) describes and network "on IPv6" and treats 6LowPAN as an encoding of IPv6.

See "OCF Will Run Over Thread" <https://www.infoq.com/news/2016/07/ocf-thread <https://www.infoq.com/news/2016/07/ocf-thread>>. They’re not operating at comparable levels in the stack.

> The industry associations that use them are the tail. Why is the tail wagging the dog?


I see no dogs wagging. From my perspective, I see a wagging tail on a dog that doesn’t even know it has one.

--james woodyatt <jhw@google.com <mailto:jhw@google.com>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email