IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Disabling temporary addresses by default?

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 29 January 2020 22:41 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36F212001B for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:41:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iO2kWrHAoaDd for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:41:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38F89120019 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:41:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id d15so1724841iog.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:41:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=g/sttd6BpedH/8GfG1vcps2DDjkcoP/Zw4PxTbTsT7w=; b=Paja89PXSEWU+YZ506ClJ4YB4lGqX5V4CO8PoIEZR2XaU3mtx+Lr9Nf0rREff6o5C9 QxsxwKKsve1ub4KyqoFoPy8d+4xTWMXjWmg+bLjusPLVxin/Qhah0f9DDsLvGuD/SCU1 w23AfmF7lYwDWhebf+Gb/o5kLQCvEzs8FHtruTrHzPk9XlJfSXrkm8l3M7eEopl49G2J MRsi1D3KYzGFQA+T2z7K8EsoisUyXU57yaMHFucxoTV5L9sjzjYHtV09RHHPt2H+ziyA ICCEv3rlkAMhC/jWegq4gkSbTfv2C/LgZfbjE8N9DKZ/kfwanZybFWOhdq6O+CNSB/Jl s3ww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=g/sttd6BpedH/8GfG1vcps2DDjkcoP/Zw4PxTbTsT7w=; b=cA7k6dj+l+6NgYPkUb1zUc12+Fl0zM4nxNga400ZgF8SFZE+LIiKrMd/Z5GirwzfOQ RS4XBf1kTwIIcTRXU4m9ed3tX1+xpcVJ4fW/3MId41tZ7nQ6qzp22rmrqal7HVXleZBL 1q7rYQfhL10fbSUHng+TfzMQsbSUlH82Alt/b+yXGxfZqVBYEDe4bs5oY1q1R/gsEJE9 cLKJgytVSVHTRn7rZC9D1okWBJJFdAiVawH7aljaASh+MTfvScMfGCcDv2BmSDAI5X58 v1z6BO2kf7Ai2NdnFinr0I50WIzsbULBEh+ThBMKIPgjOgApBK9UCQuybvl0W94433Kk xJxg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUwz6wrYVOTJGiQw2cPuEwAmc9c95BaYxwcrx5olX1hJ2Q5bnce nTVMmy98llIiqkuq2mDniSiKEOXMTtVxEysxB73+2A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwwCdDZtiM5kEVoP+dFetxVycCBIChQeVvwuk7z6S30+Tn21iEBG6cnldqNWeFTvrYrf8ipwt1Xj/PRAuP3248=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:700e:: with SMTP id l14mr1682367ioc.170.1580337688184; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:41:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKD1Yr11_SSUkCBuQ3-h+eRg0LPZQdhe+h7f0YZy9TiyRWj6mw@mail.gmail.com> <751D59E0-F60B-4FE1-840F-3FEAB82F618F@huitema.net> <c058863d-9e29-3ddb-a020-0ebadef26ad4@si6networks.com> <CABNhwV0KsKN7LQY2D-BJkCtvB40oZCT65EmOCr0oE56c9g7-aQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr05GqFr1r018qHZev8SB6Gd=zm_45TtuShQH_5PVkXpKw@mail.gmail.com> <56BD2286-D761-44EF-812B-82BAFB380992@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr23BOEQztLyxu8BF4ivVCmX-Aspv6XfAMUHNR=iDp7uKg@mail.gmail.com> <83FE7A0B-DB50-47CB-85DA-507A33CFCD37@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr2xE4C3xaXP=b-sxKGV_CnQugjpOVe_xUpRW1sSoLNGCg@mail.gmail.com> <f1bd6e0a-3408-3b0e-963f-7041eff578e9@foobar.org>
In-Reply-To: <f1bd6e0a-3408-3b0e-963f-7041eff578e9@foobar.org>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:41:15 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1_3v7DTh+YRKgB3QQu7FWyxFgyPXhw3M0PYzQ+JOEyQg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Disabling temporary addresses by default?
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000882d49059d4f0ad3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/2ZQj9jEqVgW9-MF4ocVcV-FaGNA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 22:41:31 -0000

On Wed, 29 Jan 2020, 23:40 Nick Hilliard, <nick@foobar.org> wrote:

> >     Anything you can cite here?
> >
> > RFC 4941 section 2.1?
>
> wasn't Ole looking for data rather than canon?
>

I don't see how asking for data in the abstract is helpful given that we
already have an engineering document about this. If anyone thinks that
document is wrong, that's fine, but they should point out where and how it
is wrong and we can discuss that.

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email