IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Disabling temporary addresses by default?

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 28 January 2020 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EB5120026 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:31:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xLynDFIPadJ1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:31:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf29.google.com (mail-qv1-xf29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4C1E12006D for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf29.google.com with SMTP id p2so6727340qvo.10 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:31:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=m9hDn+6LcCFMzI5n+2kgbk+N76MqoKy3CBpgv1zpOkM=; b=ZtDOPsfGOYfigk+6M6mocfwJyiVly+PMp0QqZg6So7L/+FZXT5XX07tLUEeWqKayOH l1+mu2qzef1Ow2pLoZmxQS3uxZMUjyb7BROWAPKZfsYSqsgoEgH6x85LxZF/xT+76l2H pm9RUV1hWYzqvhByTcf+AFy2QJgREi43fhZ7hs6xmdXze0yGR8a2UI8DmAtIE2lrMa4p zeo+m8IWDMCs2sC6YDOctnLdj2rmqt5fDy2QYEOGH2QiZwl9qa+sWS5RsDkCnBCDM/Ty Aoqk8NTgHlCX+3kpc7aqfER8eno1e3kDU505zv9kVgGAmv4o194NxRmF+0STjgVn844+ Y0pg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=m9hDn+6LcCFMzI5n+2kgbk+N76MqoKy3CBpgv1zpOkM=; b=p9O9cMn4ie98bAE5xGJg98r8/yCkOKDa9xq6dACmNWyIwmq6aXh0d0y70gTnPnGITI vPOTYQaeBvioQPa1uCpUkNxeG7DD6A16wo3axkO92Zv8tKX1UU/ewgbD8bZWnG89ccq/ sjf0iwm8cFYmZ+PSmF79YdmTJ5EKnuvgweFoPyj/swD5ZW5+H0r88F+fzO0GcnxKuYv4 CzH2j9RBqlIX28p2oRzUXjiRxO+H6ger4sNPgKph5PoGkcRuECdjsvPFrSWEcWpmrfqy 1GG4+0324H9RHIKtQak1EtT+IYdc2TD9xnjFzG0j9Qjw2vZtA2MujGK9JlpBJIaNhLf7 t0Xg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV4I5FTiqX6E/nhP4UOzkipfYyq7jI9oODfLxn16y2+zxmO0X/4 0xAXAdpHJBTSvtxvgU/ZQj/E0/AA32O9Hw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxL4vh8N04O2Qd5QDd94EvQ6qC6oMkJm3BESH/OSFBUgLh+mHNkuRM8i3E/shnP4+/vWlpZmQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:a41:: with SMTP id ee1mr10539613qvb.149.1580236275102; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:28e6:2936:576c:ee40? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:28e6:2936:576c:ee40]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h6sm13183299qtr.33.2020.01.28.10.31.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:31:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <45FE2F3C-EA41-4442-A680-C3875D056A89@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D5DA1A42-6C74-42E7-B610-4B9F75F73787"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.13.2.1\))
Subject: Re: Disabling temporary addresses by default?
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 13:31:13 -0500
In-Reply-To: <82c53268-42f6-080d-753c-fbb3558e941d@foobar.org>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
References: <CAKD1Yr11_SSUkCBuQ3-h+eRg0LPZQdhe+h7f0YZy9TiyRWj6mw@mail.gmail.com> <751D59E0-F60B-4FE1-840F-3FEAB82F618F@huitema.net> <DE05D0CD-CF68-4DCF-93A6-30CD11B39650@fugue.com> <82c53268-42f6-080d-753c-fbb3558e941d@foobar.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.13.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/CmnJlDJHG0EJO38vIm6B_EdiKDE>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 18:31:19 -0000

On Jan 28, 2020, at 11:51 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
> in which case you've defeated the entire purpose of the privacy address.

No, you haven’t.  You just aren’t getting privacy with that connection.  You still get it with all your HTTP connections.   When I ssh into my server at work, they know who I am; this isn’t a problem for me.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email