Re: Disabling temporary addresses by default?

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 29 January 2020 11:19 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A46C120828 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 03:19:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id REk70-viHNjs for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 03:19:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x135.google.com (mail-il1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F3D5120220 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 03:19:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x135.google.com with SMTP id i7so10388385ilr.7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 03:19:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xE7dL07DxRCoz4kRm4NN7lG7a3uaR1wcCSsljJj533A=; b=VD/0XER3EtjJRIQhw+9EPuyYEGpHeHFRCtNpSuRwR1oIPjch5d8AAcwWantU5jKWoa JTe9J4nKmDxiVGFqQVWGCLhFSSMSciq3SpF5y8Tv7JCvNucocTvLYzITnwLepjNDs+F4 QaoLSisGOSLakNXwtcFIm9hgmW6reu/pHDx3UXYoz81+bzy5PttN9XdCNEDY3mjSjhJk txw7iDAcHburVjZlZ0JfUEOGBB4wOZOFZXwtb0YiHhslwaFdcjEys5jjM9v6lf46/myG XvOTB56qZTcnnkqo13S+jwpyv4Ys84bumuiG4dGYhIrg2s+sVG99oV0STJLi8aq6XjVY r+dg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xE7dL07DxRCoz4kRm4NN7lG7a3uaR1wcCSsljJj533A=; b=S4RzQY0Hyr/HaH3eoOnoixH4hAfb8/vSXLOoPdyA1WvHpZjA7znuv1p/gY3hBNUZbZ WewJq9RSs56cmHD/jOrd/rvKbq3w59BE0jxz6ZpYIPmQjgURVDsEYcl6Bt43u8xE3uAu uGoPqwiyqmBJcqHwMI+PRtgURVIo7VzKPJudvhFcRvSQslOK4Qh1yQ2EhHl2GNV/BRZR RkfMC0rkVrTqPSLYDF+g3JbQ7VZ+8srvCClmBrBYi38EizAZkA8MnWntY0NwXiYPUvCO Lx5YE2qT7thcUeREgblTRKBDZ58J+YZJZa52Tiukuw92Eee0loFXM5AyFR/O1vLUmyCK RZNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX/KGmn0/uIXUGjw9a9OOwjDp8vwuOVarMaGtdJyihyF3l3rMDT xjwIWus+W1BPzc7K4g8SHad0pBbo78H/va4pgfFTr5t7
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwf2ls8hBGKrEMQxWjghnzUfrhp2XseK7HPQuwt8F5rj4DE5F4Q+4u4rtur9YZwtpUQmWliansnqGSWShFb+Xs=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:5e8b:: with SMTP id f11mr24339766ilg.178.1580296768666; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 03:19:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <03C832CE-7282-4320-BF1B-4CB7167FE6BE@employees.org> <c4166907-b6c9-a4ef-fd59-cf539bbe0405@si6networks.com> <43D76C96-C16B-4BEB-B9B8-C68D53BCE63F@fugue.com> <fb5b8377-892d-2777-ef9b-4f9ddefa6c93@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr034_tu7ZoJ1FCfDYhNSN6igm-ZQyR4u3U+UDMr=huGOw@mail.gmail.com> <1af0b06d-f9d7-5ea1-27f3-b417eb9148fa@si6networks.com> <7606A049-318D-4526-917D-F2A801BF7050@cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr1d9kORFdoOJr22J_UDJ9hLPr6AQLyWuh7=bAQKa+aXGw@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB356588FC3E8A6410B725D159D80A0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAKD1Yr35meRGh_POo_2jrHA_oazO1xUOG5G_rx43xNLFYHQsMQ@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB356526F01CAE1CADEF8E4472D80A0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAKD1Yr0-rmyzz3y1d+pCpA0+tGuhSdjojaJovXUzVuyx6UdeLA@mail.gmail.com> <98179a48-8d86-4673-6c82-fc0022988862@foobar.org> <F84FEFAF-1F78-47D4-B3E0-981DCFD0CB58@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr11_SSUkCBuQ3-h+eRg0LPZQdhe+h7f0YZy9TiyRWj6mw@mail.gmail.com> <1F1CE807-5466-42B3-AA37-8C916EAB545C@gmail.com> <f02490c8-5f52-acf6-75e7-109d10d89740@si6networks.com>
In-Reply-To: <f02490c8-5f52-acf6-75e7-109d10d89740@si6networks.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 20:19:16 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3H06F9__Bp99Co8vW=UNdk=bbtAvBpCjr3SuRVBDi4MQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Disabling temporary addresses by default?
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000089ad9f059d458393"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/FB_50sXwyXN0IU_X7UcRgRr0t30>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:19:31 -0000

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 7:43 AM Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:

> Option #2: Reduce the N ratio, but allow ongoing sessions to use invalid
> addresses. This could be worse than legacy RFC4941 (if long lived
> sessions last more than a week), since now temporary addresses would not
> have a limited lifetime (the lifetime would only be limited wrt the
> ability to employ them for new transport protocol instances)
>

ISTM that "using invalid addresses" is poorly defined and likely difficult
to implement. It also isn't not much (if at all) different from the current
status quo with lots of deprecated addresses. The only difference is that
it forbids allow applications from purposely binding to an expired address.
But applications don't do that - why would they? The current privacy
address is better than that address in every way.