IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Disabling temporary addresses by default?

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 28 January 2020 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0955120019 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 08:45:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ZICOkrJlJqN for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 08:45:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com (mail-qt1-x830.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 956E5120013 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 08:45:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id d9so10742462qte.12 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 08:45:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Z0cxoQzJD+hORYwtpbnBOfX6KVuxNYlBQsZyQ801D/E=; b=Jswjrj0EG2qs/iD0m0aIA/iZNuf4LRp99/w1XtFGmmMHKV64Abuvly5KuryElELlvP JS8Io79YlvZ8HZK4ZMcggHLcp6l8s3rop3kKiQwcJVgv/P6Xi01mQwZXCewsXdyKFVFT tnA3RNV5s1hIWlDnEOOX3JEO/1CUD+SzmvFlZpKSfN35cNhuBMZVu3hxFUROV/5Ev/kH YrXDpA6udELPRReM4FILLQ77P0AndfE4pKT+hNaa8GQjxHqZtk2ajoULWeQhjUN+iDdO TAcp/wZWML7Dj5cxzE7MLhAG2xcWVu0n9VVcggjl/ylN9MwcdMrhVcsw+OOS0j23XrgN Fy6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Z0cxoQzJD+hORYwtpbnBOfX6KVuxNYlBQsZyQ801D/E=; b=LFRi8qQqrJ/iirDjZ31z9k7NlOXtnQ6Ib0apwaBIL9xeMcwwDdyhaf1tyByJ13IHRN jGq1Om5ad8/v0TsWiBmfR9Ypww3oy/NLCy1aNWQML/6Tuh0/XwyJkft4ATvRoLOVL8Wv fXbIP4d2SyNqdW0fwBDztnwvnvbf0R5P1wNbr1zrPRho2nsuQryd43TEIwUHRHDFjOtT eNLmlYA1yupGL8RvUHFqi+l/N7Lb48u0wbGntfooBfgSNB5ETYYb3gRhW+V6VAqUi6G3 FWrH1OBxky9KW3dfTVMd4BgwGdKDFrBHIRu5pZxN4GXqbPn1UVGUtfPFRaBwX1uuBcq6 QXNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV3Uy1GzsnThKqnA1CETHNakknANX+mh5Ml1MTzH3oXMlV0x6Ns FcRbUC5YhA13vB5YlfdEW4bSSXj8v/3GHg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxbEYn2TaoDsEAg/1AkpKOZ7JPOqu63lAFsZue3Pics1PoIwpe/6BgOZ9HWWMQZ6iCVZy24Mw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:6ec1:: with SMTP id f1mr7794992qtv.144.1580229916603; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 08:45:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:28e6:2936:576c:ee40? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:28e6:2936:576c:ee40]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m95sm12827215qte.41.2020.01.28.08.45.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Jan 2020 08:45:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <DE05D0CD-CF68-4DCF-93A6-30CD11B39650@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3988850B-4C69-4631-9D25-B73E97CAC9E6"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.13.2.1\))
Subject: Re: Disabling temporary addresses by default?
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 11:45:15 -0500
In-Reply-To: <751D59E0-F60B-4FE1-840F-3FEAB82F618F@huitema.net>
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
References: <CAKD1Yr11_SSUkCBuQ3-h+eRg0LPZQdhe+h7f0YZy9TiyRWj6mw@mail.gmail.com> <751D59E0-F60B-4FE1-840F-3FEAB82F618F@huitema.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.13.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/MBj5KDZHbP5b9pCV7an2N3uqMZA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 16:45:21 -0000

On Jan 28, 2020, at 11:27 AM, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> wrote:
> That seems plausible, but how about going one step further and for clients just have one temporary and one deprecated address, without any stable address? If the client is not running any server, that makes address management much simpler.

And breaks any stable sessions at the expiry interval, unless the protocol adds a session layer.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email