IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Disabling temporary addresses by default?

Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 03 February 2020 22:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE0312006E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 14:42:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PfkhaBG6Jaiq for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 14:42:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com (mail-ot1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9FC1120044 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 14:42:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id 59so15270320otp.12 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 14:42:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RBpclLlgDV2CzZetWi25bQdzF6x/kV5zFlL/xOTjvYA=; b=pSLCwwGuZ5prC1yn+qaTYUqcG3/brAEL8Y/ptf5ikiFDNqVr4y3c07qZs4GZprR6el DXr5sXLOAlxgA0qR8rfOfiFiiiFYIln1ZDShobsKKQVQc/HnboZTa3tsm9iaUK5X6Vih zOkU9CsJ0ZnzmaObi8PXHDGwm/CzGFkUUymXlOcYdfc5RrZs/FMXxWV9yoFHkY+w/Vqg 7pAW2ALc+LHEZWSwUTBS+YbKAMRlbZJUXeiX5Z3T7W+paaHTBpqaoOmcxpmLVh33jOeR qT/qEO+bUqE+yKk8m/E6cmvfbXwW6d9raZ/OqSnyTB9Bv1yh9S+UHbdKAZVIlP+GdoqG ggZw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RBpclLlgDV2CzZetWi25bQdzF6x/kV5zFlL/xOTjvYA=; b=h6y9uHlsVFOtZ6zs2XBFrBGfT65HqsH8AIs9cNQODqhXXPrBCVzAr/H4ZwSfOuLPp5 uT7aJn8CVGcQ51sntHtUdxzJXENM+52iNpnobeI009CSBSzuPEZA9qOJdbnxYD6RLFYu 1bhgRdBXAab7UVz580cwBV9zo1ze/WpUZMPx/8fQqQp+CsDAbLAxgJbX2185cyLqJgRa 9DuEVSnIxzOsxxe6HD6kJYel/tkKFm/TSPA7hxgPHmB0fhbE1/mTlNouTxJmkHOtHmQo oBun24v6fwBUUXQ18PbdK6gRF+n1nEN+ln0n6fN0BKuysoV5/cGhGx80yzvmnVwb9bFW IBpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUcoO+q7CGX19mQVk3aGW2AVBuzhGZKYIhjkU7AoaIl19UXiohY O/+5c5Zm2EtKg+nyCcRbf6G+CAZVv//53HnmLA8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwZY2Z1hMe8QAtqqB6I/aioR8A4aoPiq5PxdnywmQIGcjunvUnr0UXtNpo7baYSX5WWxgKfTMF9aFQzpAqHML0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:607:: with SMTP id w7mr9912379oti.155.1580769748146; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 14:42:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABNhwV2=TPU+CQ1zBu58DmRD7i3=tBsdZvuOxuaS_jQLZ-ebBw@mail.gmail.com> <2E8EF340-72CD-46BC-A634-22571BC5E705@puck.nether.net> <CAO42Z2we-rJTdou9pR8509J1wS95Hfz67+=ThxKJkEZpTe0H4Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2we-rJTdou9pR8509J1wS95Hfz67+=ThxKJkEZpTe0H4Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 14:42:17 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMGpriXRMEU8Fek-+i95Fy2zc6=y0Xm4UtxiYiZGC9ENrMPe9w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Disabling temporary addresses by default?
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Cc: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004f5c42059db3a303"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/x3WXga-weFm84nUyMqTAKq5nlUo>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 22:42:31 -0000

On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 12:53 AM Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, 2 Feb 2020, 19:05 Jared Mauch, <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
>> They are also useful and needed when debugging hashing or 802.3ad related
>> issues. To debug the flow hash you often need stable addresses which are
>> not easily changed
>
>
> Can you explain how you do this troubleshooting? Do you spoof end users
> addresses?
>
>
> or provided by the average user who just expects the technology to work.
>
>
> Temporary addresses have been the default on Apple OS X since Lion in 2011
> and Windows Vista in 2007. That doesn't seem to have prevented IPv6 working
> for the average user.
>
>
Android's been doing this for a while too, and has no Happy Eyeballs to
mask any problems it might have caused.  I'm inclined to think there is no
real issue with tempaddrs being enabled for general purpose nodes.


>
>> Sent from my iCar
>>
>> > On Feb 1, 2020, at 4:24 PM, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Stable random IPv6 address works best to meet the objective of an
>> enterprise.
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email