IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: SLAAC vs DHCPv6 (II) (was:Re: RFC4941bis: consequences of many addresses for the network)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 28 January 2020 01:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F953A0832 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:44:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CX5oVp9mSwW6 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:44:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82d.google.com (mail-qt1-x82d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73A893A0833 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:44:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82d.google.com with SMTP id t13so8678613qto.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:44:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=ZJrPJCR6nRujQv2TbTRfLLold6Gma4ZM+zJR+Ye3qFA=; b=WjAheHqUyhuGdDCt/kaQ5f7HSv3gOajsGsBNTqu9ur4jj19kdsMNBRGPi2UvjddQs2 VdEzjfSLVrY0aZkY4OIxAVWsOE8QwoS4e/ztSCjM6XX+f5o3scSwyHjGj0E4zoorAUE/ q2kachQOLM6aWVW4Can+AB/csBt2+mgRGQIwJJHLuD1r8rZvcFwumL+Sx9IZqws6iYSs om//SocjzkLSApnomuB0WE9lg4m5nzf2jv8+btlB4l4vcvTpTsNN0OwBcy2jLHZGTvU5 JxYhBxITd4tIQlyNWRTKKRO5dpNei2D7b3YI0J7ppZbp1GEDk6EcWwZ51MxVv3bIbM5W a1Eg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=ZJrPJCR6nRujQv2TbTRfLLold6Gma4ZM+zJR+Ye3qFA=; b=bGaxdvpNzM7SRoNhSXnH4llNSPW6VhBmrB3R8xxLOpGkrJcGCQIuuFW8yV01TeetZH MIycKdkarNwe3l4X9w7Qo/vkZgw58viHYjq2+NlTdKMlcyvIiMAFmfIXU7HiPVw8EfN5 t7sn8Q2FxY+aRpeJhJnU+RuvkkhsttKa7FJRKToYd98ZnADzpFpCWjdK+ODa0ZWsOKt7 GYS8fU6Lhl+GtHo2fzZoiE99JvL6bmtomYu4fNHKhA2EXwGuxKyhPxBloFYluQg1HSoW YMvO9MV0GXhyk2cfDmKnCvEjXRM3rPzeeStSWhUFz8a1MhUwSFf2WWMahxKJ4QA0pRwZ d1DA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVhwVJxg2G0gKjakeJ3Itv1EwgjiA3px/tZz3lQR0jpT0bxy+fG iZ8zOeL1X3er+1EU6DjGW8LENH3FP6o2Ug==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzQQyA791MxhFoIAgP2J9F1eE0s60otkmxipLxvjSs51PlK0BZ65sVZ3ip7YHFky7tEAYx05g==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:145:: with SMTP id f5mr18735645qtg.194.1580175891437; Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:44:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:d991:b2eb:68f2:db7c? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:d991:b2eb:68f2:db7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i14sm11143835qkl.133.2020.01.27.17.44.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Jan 2020 17:44:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <43D76C96-C16B-4BEB-B9B8-C68D53BCE63F@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B3222106-A006-4D9F-A2B2-54E2AC3B4500"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.4\))
Subject: Re: SLAAC vs DHCPv6 (II) (was:Re: RFC4941bis: consequences of many addresses for the network)
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 20:44:49 -0500
In-Reply-To: <c4166907-b6c9-a4ef-fd59-cf539bbe0405@si6networks.com>
Cc: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
References: <03C832CE-7282-4320-BF1B-4CB7167FE6BE@employees.org> <MN2PR11MB3565330989D411525D30B90DD80F0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <80207E17-AE8E-4D19-B516-D2E6AB70721E@employees.org> <8D5610EA-49D3-483E-BB7A-67D67BC89346@jisc.ac.uk> <DE7B0688-230F-4A5C-8E24-9EAED9FD9FEB@puck.nether.net> <AFEBAD7D-DF24-4924-8B9A-60DF22BA1953@consulintel.es> <c42affce-fbd3-23ec-c9ff-4f05cdf38630@si6networks.com> <41173152-A8E8-4241-9DE7-376AA7AFB813@consulintel.es> <c4166907-b6c9-a4ef-fd59-cf539bbe0405@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ebLjDwkzPZKQDxJQs_WKVL3nlV4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 01:44:54 -0000

On Jan 27, 2020, at 4:47 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> "b)" sounds quite a bit like making SLAAC stateful.

Somebody tried to do this in DHC a few years ago, but it never got much interest.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email