IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Address privacy (was: Re: RFC4941bis: consequences of many addresses for the network)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Sun, 26 January 2020 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AE2120091 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 07:28:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L1a1ePw_hcCU for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 07:28:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x831.google.com (mail-qt1-x831.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::831]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5815012008F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 07:28:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x831.google.com with SMTP id e5so5534379qtm.6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 07:28:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=tBZ0p1L27R+cQmwDWb8G/+wBX3ByZatw/WJwy1eBAEw=; b=EJkZD4pqbLpNhdLURO3hlxDS/ZI6yb7PIFNO3WQKdPfJ88AJo2upMY/S66ssHWrIOH XIZRI6OekrmP1ix7IwpDhB+kyo27uOtjsR23ybRsWdOIa8Ew6UDqoTKvDDWEJbWivoWD z1XO120dVpP0/YQXiycwUR6YYxKrsHQv5/fgHUKoWZ0do8CIGfaFjS7wqyv2kxLxbJmI K29Q331S5LtKpj5cSVSGTOB1tjppB5ItigENEFsu/dUM4uifsW4NpWmyFsES7Stkb8l6 tV2nrHaDxOWNSMlMRAq2es7PXpG5wfNqxfhU+SPE00YE80ROgX6dz9Wc3FesbUb+ShCF 6SoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=tBZ0p1L27R+cQmwDWb8G/+wBX3ByZatw/WJwy1eBAEw=; b=tYlIdRNscNvArkfN4bbB5jBKMaAjuv7/EfLdh7fw2P2QfFYHvsAN3SNzYMd/ghxTOl ZdfTUfNzT/36KHGkC37ebZbURFs1hUQnD8WokFg5ArvMQw4Gp4xmkNhctGsdvaPDMLT4 3+RgyZPWPvDBwr2FPnczxmCYx40nzr3zMH/TK2KngcrP4x9mtQw6uKaDYFFupdkUCjJW naCciUo69YGULmD3ZwE/RfX2/A2qjAgZNLO/Yg6yQsdvZVhmJABPOMZ9pUQlaS1RWYz8 BTIHycTdd1LKhVDBDs/ll72nmDJlXt3oohtNCT4XOxTfThPgLrkdo4Apsc+leCNj7IzN TuAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWLzakyIyCErqVFXcXYih+2nxX8H9adCbmRHhcqnrUd8bkADXml MUUx8ykxuUOxSq6HC1j51suZrhLQqHpglg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqweTzj55l9Wx14XXcm0H9af008bP0PQYVlDj8HkwQX4P7Gq4e39uaMCBk+/242XATrt0DaRoQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:38ae:: with SMTP id f43mr12108713qtc.291.1580052534202; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 07:28:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:5dcb:1c62:6c5d:4337? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:5dcb:1c62:6c5d:4337]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k4sm7683983qtj.74.2020.01.26.07.28.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Jan 2020 07:28:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <D4C40CE0-B8BE-47AF-9E69-BDE7513E35CB@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_811848F3-F507-4D04-B2CB-F31F44423534"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.4\))
Subject: Re: Address privacy (was: Re: RFC4941bis: consequences of many addresses for the network)
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 10:28:52 -0500
In-Reply-To: <233CE79D-B9BF-4335-8568-D178BD10CEAC@puck.nether.net>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
References: <6f2a8e5a-a4f6-219b-d7c8-ba79ed257785@huitema.net> <233CE79D-B9BF-4335-8568-D178BD10CEAC@puck.nether.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/PC82-VMhbzP6X1Y2SubXY-vup64>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:28:58 -0000

On Jan 26, 2020, at 6:56 AM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> It also means things like my ssh sessions can't last long enough to do large transfers as the address is rotated away. 

If there’s a TCP session holding a reference count on the address, why is it being deleted?  That sounds like a bug, not a problem with privacy addresses.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email