IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [keyassure] Opening issue #21: "Need to specify which crypto

bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com Tue, 08 March 2011 04:56 UTC

Return-Path: <bmanning@karoshi.com>
X-Original-To: keyassure@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: keyassure@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E803A683D for <keyassure@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 20:56:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EkOIurmuFpMi for <keyassure@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 20:56:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vacation.karoshi.com (vacation.karoshi.com [198.32.6.68]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C1F3A67CF for <keyassure@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 20:56:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from karoshi.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by vacation.karoshi.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id p284tn7s005353; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 04:56:18 GMT
Received: (from bmanning@localhost) by karoshi.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id p284tEWJ005340; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 04:55:14 GMT
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:55:08 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Message-ID: <20110308045508.GA5304@vacation.karoshi.com.>
References: <4D752197.5090403@vpnc.org> <E1PwoBp-00079A-ED@login01.fos.auckland.ac.nz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1PwoBp-00079A-ED@login01.fos.auckland.ac.nz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Cc: keyassure@ietf.org, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org
Subject: Re: [keyassure] Opening issue #21: "Need to specify which crypto
X-BeenThere: keyassure@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Key Assurance With DNSSEC <keyassure.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/keyassure>, <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/keyassure>
List-Post: <mailto:keyassure@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/keyassure>, <mailto:keyassure-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:56:37 -0000

On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 05:06:29PM +1300, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> writes:
> 
> >Are you saying that the rough consensus is obvious, or that you believe there
> >can be none and we should give up, or...?
> 
> I believe we should shoot anyone who doesn't agree that { SHA256 + SHA3 } is
> the right solution.  Then we will have consensus and can move on.  But that's
> just my opinion...
> 
> Peter.

	two to the chest, one to the head...

or in other words

+1

--bill (I beleive also)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email