Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Tue, 31 May 2022 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA69FC157B48; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ByQxpDFjBvTF; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AF44C15C010; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id o6-20020a17090a0a0600b001e2c6566046so2818660pjo.0; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=271ou2MmhU0HgRp+amSEFWTqrY/y92JwfNowznqgd4c=; b=qABf8goxRluD274HGQjzU+t+hQX7Ac3iuEAnzhlZcY38xDfMGPWFMHNEp/fL82TF8x k3zlkzQGlO3gS2YGaJJLrUtV6PHj9Wzqt4B1I+zuGxTDCf893xokfLdvLnDpYs7kGcdf uL9vfI9kf5MVedug6Qm9WqV9lpjApXz7BGJ/nBC5+vWFsg5wDmuAC+j4XWsAupyU54fV yrhMinE3G4HVbxMpdgnp9l/kV5iEs5HbJIEuYv4GtpEKfgPb3QIkhtU+tgO41A76J/XN 4zMc8DLLRq5SXMf7sgOlqEONHnvRMV0j2S5392p4KMKS0xTXCPHWXQU0u4S3dmiht49V fOQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=271ou2MmhU0HgRp+amSEFWTqrY/y92JwfNowznqgd4c=; b=gQAXcf8QJ/6Yev3snhY2FtkaJOf8bEg9lEI3hFEUEtW91WIt/NbkGZU8R9opV3Nq3V qmOQZ6uJR2b1DhJylT5up0SPcDzr7Ky4NG+FITHbl2Y7F1nsFlJbqtPbIwwuyELlBSxK 9Wk1U0vbCj4QXPDUwMF6Dcah8oTv8b41Z8KI3J6qYvPrXBWVUswMRS+ETZNVkXmie4TP c+tSSQzHug+8xiYcRDa4gOBdaKy1Y9P1dTsXGSJXSJzCyQAsvLr6UCtd1MLiq9Ex7alj lHyrnYAQ8IoxTPDpTh+iLWDqBeOzVnpa1Qg6qXPKLeCARbLyDgmbkayKCf1ySJBVboNG eM8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5329XfDRrJtww+la6IVuJjD/VdreEwwK5cPg5KYf74AuEU4t3hOW hOPdY4F6MJ9cRT/1dDXfWrFLpqbZpRpKUxvGxuw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxDpV3G7BjO/dp7axDuNyCPnulVT03c6hjyOYmgtguGy/ZO8R3XAT+IhdKJVeZYQ+soprPR+OVFF8DAuPid3ew=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1e0a:b0:1e3:5e2:2def with SMTP id pg10-20020a17090b1e0a00b001e305e22defmr9928139pjb.26.1654005653494; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6e5c6fa9-539f-80c3-7c92-5b97ad67560c@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <6e5c6fa9-539f-80c3-7c92-5b97ad67560c@pi.nu>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 10:00:42 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV23JG0Go9vgiqEbGtu-6VKATjAw9ivsg=L+_hobRqa6Hw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Cc: DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006ede3a05e04f3385"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/2pu3UbW1Sr_8JrlVmlkchn71lsM>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 14:02:11 -0000

Dear MPLS WG

I support #1 allocation of new SPL for NAI for either ISD or PSD solutions.

Thank you

Gyan

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 5:21 PM Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

> MPLS Working Group, MPLS Open DT,
>
> The MPLS Network Actions (MNA) framework requires a method of indicating
> the presence of a Network Action and any Ancillary Data.
>
> Is the consensus of the working group that we do this by:
>
>    (1) allocating a new SPL for Network Action Indicators?
>
>    (2) re-purposing the ELI SPL?
>
>    (3) using some other method of indicating this such as making it an
>        additional property of an ordinary label?
>
> Please respond to the MPLS WG mail list.
>
> Loa Andersson
> for the Open DT wg chairs
>
> --
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*



*M 301 502-1347*