IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Fri, 17 June 2022 01:09 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401C7C157B52; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 18:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LLFM9lVa4ixq; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 18:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40A4FC14CF15; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 18:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml709-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4LPLXr5W6bz67xZG; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:09:16 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.199) by fraeml709-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 03:09:26 +0200
Received: from kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.199) by kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.199) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:09:25 +0800
Received: from kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.199]) by kwepemi500009.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.199]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:09:25 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators
Thread-Index: AQHYdGtWO3qWKssEfkW+nEJ2b13K5K1FNvuAgAykSICAABHFgIAADUeAgADo1UA=
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 01:09:24 +0000
Message-ID: <55e92766b8d448bbaa93d0f9902e439e@huawei.com>
References: <6e5c6fa9-539f-80c3-7c92-5b97ad67560c@pi.nu> <447_1654704927_62A0CB1F_447_309_1_1f59cd955500419a988e2218a3f2246e@orange.com> <9F79E3D5-7ACE-4D15-83D7-8BF3FF60F671@gmail.com> <C9D1FD4A-2549-49C0-8904-84E3F559E85C@cisco.com> <988F5CAF-1A12-4209-92B5-B9AE75477B5C@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <988F5CAF-1A12-4209-92B5-B9AE75477B5C@tony.li>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.40.195]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_55e92766b8d448bbaa93d0f9902e439ehuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/jHVR99QSbzkOHc70a8xJNsBvE0Q>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 01:09:35 -0000

Looking at Zafar's reply, I do not feel any uncomfortable.
Kireeti claimed hardware cannot do something. Zafar just showed an implementation example to justify.
I my opinion, the implementation practice should be encouraged.

Tianran
From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tony Li
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2022 3:10 AM
To: Zafar Ali (zali) <zali=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org; pals-chairs@ietf.org; DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators





The draft has been implemented for the exact (SLID) use-case on hardware platforms based on Broadcom Jericho2 family of ASIC
Please take a look at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id-04#section-7
No such issue was noted


And Jericho2 is the only thing that counts in the entire world?

T

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email