IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Tue, 31 May 2022 00:02 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B7AC14CF13; Mon, 30 May 2022 17:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nu9-tKLfMSXX; Mon, 30 May 2022 17:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com (mail-pl1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8594BC1A7F36; Mon, 30 May 2022 17:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id h1so2231930plf.11; Mon, 30 May 2022 17:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=r6O6N7M1u7od96vkgr7/SnObWuqKok2n+Rz+NxK21GU=; b=NzrM6822MdMkBlmTSB/CGth6HIUEvG6xkw0qkBqDDo8IATHhEGCZx8FJZwj3ValrRM ioYGP0bIOAH/5OTxPC0LLtbIMsU0G2UYQF8uPH+1mu8TPKhIYVwdhrun2bGxG+/oJ50u xUIQ1qSUWK8YDyMDaCY402L2ERfgZs0g2R/e9OKjolnmj4iYPaUoG2D4t7FZAS/EfE3C L57T5R67jNv9dEetO32La469Fkj0LYKmexsdvHbmKu580cNcMUA0r9gPueCgXEEooBWy yKWlUDcJDAolXICDmLizlZ39h1chPZUs7Zdp0JbTfGYDZW3Enq4OJ7iDhQlf7AA3I/t7 ZLvQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=r6O6N7M1u7od96vkgr7/SnObWuqKok2n+Rz+NxK21GU=; b=C8bmmyQuB6FKKyrDuLL6Unnn6uv42gyY+NWiDB+udKsRy72zwtd7nz9STgoDYmFZYW gey0J0DQZ8ReLz7qJbgyY8llTyFMWqrNTLt/KUEMRpguUY1iSqYqIjtqCyKDfyP9oaVE zND5GgNKFxWQD7h2he0MPW8eK/VVXQ3giUGec/NJ38FAXQxiFZLviHUlbxdVIcpBXmej fFt5Gw2HqwzkK1zi+o61iNOETJMltKINcIJAVUcomgYVQpqj5e2qKV2qa78UCu9WoMDH x8FRYJhCBu+1zsFu5gsD0YecLRsy6nZmNfV4cAp4VaBCGj7utV8PtnOj6+s1qIOD8riQ Ygdg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5303232+qpXcC9XCUm9DMSe46TYQYM9ee4XMcMlylYcYwlMQFfzr aD7vNVVpHwkbLVxyWHohbvhFPpOfUdQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwr9Z0bYhQKoV+PeBiLb6fov9vfGF8tKM2vr7GnwM3eB7Awvs/mJzU8JPtMdC2k3s93+2CZNA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8602:b0:161:b911:8ba8 with SMTP id f2-20020a170902860200b00161b9118ba8mr58950920plo.38.1653955364932; Mon, 30 May 2022 17:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-67-169-103-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.103.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b8-20020a17090a488800b001df93c8e737sm263765pjh.39.2022.05.30.17.02.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 May 2022 17:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\))
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <6e5c6fa9-539f-80c3-7c92-5b97ad67560c@pi.nu>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 17:02:43 -0700
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8DA45EBC-C0AF-4C5E-803E-5B4DA010ED32@tony.li>
References: <6e5c6fa9-539f-80c3-7c92-5b97ad67560c@pi.nu>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/iU-uNla8JvLpZ-_sK1C7_kn4jBE>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 00:02:47 -0000

Hi all,


> The MPLS Network Actions (MNA) framework requires a method of indicating the presence of a Network Action and any Ancillary Data.
> 
> Is the consensus of the working group that we do this by:
> 
>  (1) allocating a new SPL for Network Action Indicators?
> 
>  (2) re-purposing the ELI SPL?
> 
>  (3) using some other method of indicating this such as making it an
>      additional property of an ordinary label?



(4) allocating a new SPL for a Network Action Sub-stack.


This is significantly different than (1) as NAI may not be part of the sub-stack and could be in the PSD.  And a solution may choose to have NAI and ISD in the sub-stack.

Yes, I am trying to be precise about definitions. No, I’m not a lawyer. Worse: I’m a mathematician. :-)

Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email