Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators

bruno.decraene@orange.com Wed, 08 June 2022 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A177DC14CF14; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x8vt5SbeGuoY; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CD18C14CF0F; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar03.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfedar22.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4LJBNP2Yh4z2xn4; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 17:44:05 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1654703045; bh=ZgArEl6K4Ni4lw+H2u1+eKjMdnvMaOuIcayRPixgaUE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=FjFiGEIR/PcbPwlPkI+4otqR0IJk1NmUO/eu8n6ygEKDUm2trXbsUL94/QPHGBKoj 4bSCk0Vhf9CTrUX4KGg8n2jKssStPFxMRlPcwt/JrnI6+m+7AbnQ7m811V9Rdc1WIx qFi5DW7SxGo8WpOydzIq7F9Yv4WjPFaGS9V0oyuIxvrSG602k1f2ZAWwqKzcrFCKKa ge1TiHHkKEpchwEGqeZhxMfMpOtDkhkKkZMp+JlzUsYw1XBmBKLVorbGAl6OgSZ+rj IHDd12sJeItMMkpNX2Lkgue9GENKay0F5aFpw54x+jiXXwUD+BpuaUTN17AG05LGRP w0NBOGJFWFHMw==
From: bruno.decraene@orange.com
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
CC: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators
Thread-Index: AQHYdPzibByd4Y31YEOzBMMeaOtS0a1FsjBQ
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 15:43:58 +0000
Message-ID: <20261_1654703045_62A0C3C5_20261_169_1_5975e1f8053045cfbbd3052864912eed@orange.com>
References: <6e5c6fa9-539f-80c3-7c92-5b97ad67560c@pi.nu> <CA+RyBmXc6UQh9yGzVo2Fskvfz7XdroKiA8RKR3x7USS3pmxSHg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmXc6UQh9yGzVo2Fskvfz7XdroKiA8RKR3x7USS3pmxSHg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_SetDate=2022-06-08T15:43:57Z; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_Name=Orange_restricted_external.2; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_SiteId=90c7a20a-f34b-40bf-bc48-b9253b6f5d20; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_ActionId=883ca6c6-367f-49dd-9d30-2986630d608f; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_ContentBits=2
x-originating-ip: [10.115.26.52]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5975e1f8053045cfbbd3052864912eedorangecom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/CAnFTZm_NxIBrfY5qXaHyOmiZac>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 15:44:10 -0000

Greg,

Extending the ELI as per draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id does not break RFC 6790 nor RFC8662.
If you believe that it does, please cites the sentences from both draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id and RFC/6790/8662 that would contradict each other or would be incompatible.

Thank you,
--Bruno

From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Greg Mirsky
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2022 4:44 PM
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org; pals-chairs@ietf.org; DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators

Dear Loa, MPLS WG Chairs, Open DT, et al.,
I believe that re-using ELI to address the requirements listed in draft-ietf-mpls-miad-mna-requirements will definitely break implementations of RFC 6790 and RFC 8662. Thus I oppose re-using ELI to indicate the presence of an MNA in a packet. I think that the specifics of the mechanism indicating the presence of an MNA should be discussed separately from the framework document.

Regards,
Greg

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 2:21 PM Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu<mailto:loa@pi.nu>> wrote:
MPLS Working Group, MPLS Open DT,

The MPLS Network Actions (MNA) framework requires a method of indicating
the presence of a Network Action and any Ancillary Data.

Is the consensus of the working group that we do this by:

   (1) allocating a new SPL for Network Action Indicators?

   (2) re-purposing the ELI SPL?

   (3) using some other method of indicating this such as making it an
       additional property of an ordinary label?

Please respond to the MPLS WG mail list.

Loa Andersson
for the Open DT wg chairs

--
Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu<mailto:loa@pi.nu>
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com<mailto:loa.pi.nu@gmail.com>
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


Orange Restricted

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.