Re: [mpls] [E] RE: Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators
"Jalil, Luay" <luay.jalil@verizon.com> Fri, 10 June 2022 13:42 UTC
Return-Path: <luay.jalil@verizon.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DCEC14CF0B for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=ZdNur/G4; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verizon-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.b=INiwZmGL
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QRIELsgGMoZT for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-0024a201.pphosted.com (mx0a-0024a201.pphosted.com [148.163.149.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BFA7C14F74A for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0114266.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0024a201.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25ACQPIq019089 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:42:21 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verizon.com; h=mime-version : references : in-reply-to : from : date : message-id : subject : to : cc : content-type; s=corp; bh=xqH5uHzk4AVO639Tddo8pLjnCUcZE+8aEiogpL911yY=; b=ZdNur/G4SDz5yWM3zmBV3awX0kQgBgdhK+zEg9SzC5pgU3rN93GxJ3IH4CzjxkHOxBgw mH1Zfy6lX5Ehw6/j4rUuzY8vm0JTspxsGhq05mHK4v2BwrxSjtL21nN3SiSp4kzFqc6Y MSN72dOznydfIrh/XtVYiTivw9GBqD7xgfc=
Received: from mail-ot1-f69.google.com (mail-ot1-f69.google.com [209.85.210.69]) by mx0a-0024a201.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gm5aesaw9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:42:21 -0400
Received: by mail-ot1-f69.google.com with SMTP id y6-20020a9d6346000000b0060c2a6ed978so1758489otk.8 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verizon-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xqH5uHzk4AVO639Tddo8pLjnCUcZE+8aEiogpL911yY=; b=INiwZmGLnn/Nutacu/ddt09OOk/iSFW9pe64xeQcl5OaZczGMbc9TGVNg0HonEXPXA GHVmE0wkc6GKr0pnDgqVqMtb12FXn/wUMFGkdXgtdJPCy33nmdxxrKEBA1EXA4Z5PREo vFvR90aVPaW3Kqdcd7B31K1qf1HwVhsQsk9YV+Sn8kX2XDUHl84iabxcXPVmQdx3e5+I oZauCMnIF0y0L46qwiLv8RSnS+QF0pkDOQjRPw1mGcADcY6BTl6COxo5waVUvdobHBI5 Htrmdp8wGYa6MZyChYlatJn3q/61d8+jhqupmDrzHZSivkOeAQqe03VIHmiyfw7TkdLZ XLAw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xqH5uHzk4AVO639Tddo8pLjnCUcZE+8aEiogpL911yY=; b=4YJkaT+8/SFTmyDoqjKghy8LND2r/PrpDAaAZ2TK8l0AmfaroxsCscF/Tt/vD4u4tm yrJ2nr1LHs1EkCoZvBU6et8QxXeNJSHkNdlSNHwWYKRZUsAKcTZDUFhDjvwl4c1Ij1dZ ZxyooYY6GdpcB7Yzp/Q8Ug6KZuLmxADQv7+MRlFEu1er/1suqkjsZ29Qo+AiNRitbsFp YGN1XlyuV7Rdw9Dlx7GuRR7L4oW3OCwqou40ZptkY8/WkK+1DMdVaLvTTtkAgzfQP3h/ 3RpsBpCAN/bAR/hpCHL9h4lCJtKKw6wlrerEU5ffPPNip7YKl7Ps5wqzEpP6vwTNx5W1 ZUyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531EXMbslXBioAr0HRTj/WRu3Zm9x6sgMszuKQIFS56mLk8tREvt J3B+xVMu/vYTZr2RsdaRnnA55x5kiyZ76tea2GZF79cNRii7voaIs7Dsl3P5h0rFUp+b0wF8kEV rBU5zUhAgmwhRnwc59qQn
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:76c3:0:b0:60b:9c19:2248 with SMTP id p3-20020a9d76c3000000b0060b9c192248mr19304663otl.62.1654868540234; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyzuSVskZ6Y7msAJ+BPOotFO5lWlFaABsqoercMy1pNqECf3X6U03Tf+emaouhh+928rSTL3bPwkggdg+fHL1Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:76c3:0:b0:60b:9c19:2248 with SMTP id p3-20020a9d76c3000000b0060b9c192248mr19304644otl.62.1654868539744; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6e5c6fa9-539f-80c3-7c92-5b97ad67560c@pi.nu> <3690_1654702434_62A0C162_3690_400_1_5144e9cb87b749ff8b0ff6e40818e6dc@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <3690_1654702434_62A0C162_3690_400_1_5144e9cb87b749ff8b0ff6e40818e6dc@orange.com>
From: "Jalil, Luay" <luay.jalil@verizon.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:41:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CAO8-O7oqvdN56vNv+V0rRi=Vi53yDdhtPaog8AMQU+TO7Dtywg@mail.gmail.com>
To: bruno.decraene@orange.com
Cc: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id@ietf.org" <draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007639dd05e1181b4b"
X-mailroute: internal
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: deib0oQjvcbN2UiHQaO5v_w-hsvsXn6a
X-Proofpoint-GUID: deib0oQjvcbN2UiHQaO5v_w-hsvsXn6a
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/uduVLaqqz3Y8JvCknCmjw-ncehY>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [E] RE: Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 13:42:27 -0000
To follow up on Bruno's comments/questions, I think we need further clarifications. Example: I saw a note against option-2 because it will break current implementations but is that the case? Thanks, *Luay* On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 11:34 AM <bruno.decraene@orange.com> wrote: > Hi Loa, > > I have a clarification question on the below poll, regarding the extension > of the ELI bSPL. > > Is the scope of the question specific to the MPLS Network Actions (MNA) > framework? > Or is the scope more general and include any extension of the ELI bSPL and > in particular applies to draft [1]? > > [1] > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Ddecraene-2Dmpls-2Dslid-2Dencoded-2Dentropy-2Dlabel-2Did_&d=DwIFAg&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=k0DrrBeS0St-D1jEwNQ_u1ZyHQXQly5fgCsWF0VTh7o&m=x3v0MKH1xgizJ7PZXaUMAHZ3m-SlLAkX9S2ThME68Hj8igr7oX82Vml_Ug8nBNOM&s=8sfIrVrjur--cXiz35I-e-oBUmwQ5MZFtZqy-6qtu94&e= > > Thanks, > Regards, > --Bruno > > Orange Restricted > > -----Original Message----- > From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Loa Andersson > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 11:22 PM > To: mpls@ietf.org > Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org; pals-chairs@ietf.org; DetNet Chairs < > detnet-chairs@ietf.org> > Subject: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network > Action Indicators > > MPLS Working Group, MPLS Open DT, > > The MPLS Network Actions (MNA) framework requires a method of indicating > the presence of a Network Action and any Ancillary Data. > > Is the consensus of the working group that we do this by: > > (1) allocating a new SPL for Network Action Indicators? > > (2) re-purposing the ELI SPL? > > (3) using some other method of indicating this such as making it an > additional property of an ordinary label? > > Please respond to the MPLS WG mail list. > > Loa Andersson > for the Open DT wg chairs > > -- > Loa Andersson email: loa@pi.nu > Senior MPLS Expert loa.pi.nu@gmail.com > Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64 > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_mpls&d=DwIFAg&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=k0DrrBeS0St-D1jEwNQ_u1ZyHQXQly5fgCsWF0VTh7o&m=x3v0MKH1xgizJ7PZXaUMAHZ3m-SlLAkX9S2ThME68Hj8igr7oX82Vml_Ug8nBNOM&s=QHgUyv-vdnaMYsdlQT_ggsG_SBMFtlw4d053DQ1ftUg&e= > > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez > recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and > delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > >
- [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for car… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Joel Halpern
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… UTTARO, JAMES
- Re: [mpls] [EXTERNAL] Re: Poll 2: New SPL vs re-p… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Rakesh Gandhi
- Re: [mpls] [E] RE: Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed… Jalil, Luay
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Weiqiang Cheng
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Kireeti Kompella
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for… bruno.decraene