Re: [mpls] [E] RE: Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators

"Jalil, Luay" <luay.jalil@verizon.com> Fri, 10 June 2022 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <luay.jalil@verizon.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DCEC14CF0B for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=ZdNur/G4; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verizon-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.b=INiwZmGL
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QRIELsgGMoZT for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-0024a201.pphosted.com (mx0a-0024a201.pphosted.com [148.163.149.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BFA7C14F74A for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0114266.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0024a201.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25ACQPIq019089 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:42:21 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verizon.com; h=mime-version : references : in-reply-to : from : date : message-id : subject : to : cc : content-type; s=corp; bh=xqH5uHzk4AVO639Tddo8pLjnCUcZE+8aEiogpL911yY=; b=ZdNur/G4SDz5yWM3zmBV3awX0kQgBgdhK+zEg9SzC5pgU3rN93GxJ3IH4CzjxkHOxBgw mH1Zfy6lX5Ehw6/j4rUuzY8vm0JTspxsGhq05mHK4v2BwrxSjtL21nN3SiSp4kzFqc6Y MSN72dOznydfIrh/XtVYiTivw9GBqD7xgfc=
Received: from mail-ot1-f69.google.com (mail-ot1-f69.google.com [209.85.210.69]) by mx0a-0024a201.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gm5aesaw9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:42:21 -0400
Received: by mail-ot1-f69.google.com with SMTP id y6-20020a9d6346000000b0060c2a6ed978so1758489otk.8 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verizon-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xqH5uHzk4AVO639Tddo8pLjnCUcZE+8aEiogpL911yY=; b=INiwZmGLnn/Nutacu/ddt09OOk/iSFW9pe64xeQcl5OaZczGMbc9TGVNg0HonEXPXA GHVmE0wkc6GKr0pnDgqVqMtb12FXn/wUMFGkdXgtdJPCy33nmdxxrKEBA1EXA4Z5PREo vFvR90aVPaW3Kqdcd7B31K1qf1HwVhsQsk9YV+Sn8kX2XDUHl84iabxcXPVmQdx3e5+I oZauCMnIF0y0L46qwiLv8RSnS+QF0pkDOQjRPw1mGcADcY6BTl6COxo5waVUvdobHBI5 Htrmdp8wGYa6MZyChYlatJn3q/61d8+jhqupmDrzHZSivkOeAQqe03VIHmiyfw7TkdLZ XLAw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xqH5uHzk4AVO639Tddo8pLjnCUcZE+8aEiogpL911yY=; b=4YJkaT+8/SFTmyDoqjKghy8LND2r/PrpDAaAZ2TK8l0AmfaroxsCscF/Tt/vD4u4tm yrJ2nr1LHs1EkCoZvBU6et8QxXeNJSHkNdlSNHwWYKRZUsAKcTZDUFhDjvwl4c1Ij1dZ ZxyooYY6GdpcB7Yzp/Q8Ug6KZuLmxADQv7+MRlFEu1er/1suqkjsZ29Qo+AiNRitbsFp YGN1XlyuV7Rdw9Dlx7GuRR7L4oW3OCwqou40ZptkY8/WkK+1DMdVaLvTTtkAgzfQP3h/ 3RpsBpCAN/bAR/hpCHL9h4lCJtKKw6wlrerEU5ffPPNip7YKl7Ps5wqzEpP6vwTNx5W1 ZUyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531EXMbslXBioAr0HRTj/WRu3Zm9x6sgMszuKQIFS56mLk8tREvt J3B+xVMu/vYTZr2RsdaRnnA55x5kiyZ76tea2GZF79cNRii7voaIs7Dsl3P5h0rFUp+b0wF8kEV rBU5zUhAgmwhRnwc59qQn
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:76c3:0:b0:60b:9c19:2248 with SMTP id p3-20020a9d76c3000000b0060b9c192248mr19304663otl.62.1654868540234; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyzuSVskZ6Y7msAJ+BPOotFO5lWlFaABsqoercMy1pNqECf3X6U03Tf+emaouhh+928rSTL3bPwkggdg+fHL1Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:76c3:0:b0:60b:9c19:2248 with SMTP id p3-20020a9d76c3000000b0060b9c192248mr19304644otl.62.1654868539744; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 06:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6e5c6fa9-539f-80c3-7c92-5b97ad67560c@pi.nu> <3690_1654702434_62A0C162_3690_400_1_5144e9cb87b749ff8b0ff6e40818e6dc@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <3690_1654702434_62A0C162_3690_400_1_5144e9cb87b749ff8b0ff6e40818e6dc@orange.com>
From: "Jalil, Luay" <luay.jalil@verizon.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 09:41:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CAO8-O7oqvdN56vNv+V0rRi=Vi53yDdhtPaog8AMQU+TO7Dtywg@mail.gmail.com>
To: bruno.decraene@orange.com
Cc: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id@ietf.org" <draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007639dd05e1181b4b"
X-mailroute: internal
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: deib0oQjvcbN2UiHQaO5v_w-hsvsXn6a
X-Proofpoint-GUID: deib0oQjvcbN2UiHQaO5v_w-hsvsXn6a
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/uduVLaqqz3Y8JvCknCmjw-ncehY>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [E] RE: Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 13:42:27 -0000

To follow up on Bruno's comments/questions, I think we need further
clarifications. Example: I saw a note against option-2 because it will
break current implementations but is that the case?

Thanks,
*Luay*


On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 11:34 AM <bruno.decraene@orange.com> wrote:

> Hi Loa,
>
> I have a clarification question on the below poll, regarding the extension
> of the ELI bSPL.
>
> Is the scope of the question specific to the MPLS Network Actions (MNA)
> framework?
> Or is the scope more general and include any extension of the ELI bSPL and
> in particular applies to draft [1]?
>
> [1]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Ddecraene-2Dmpls-2Dslid-2Dencoded-2Dentropy-2Dlabel-2Did_&d=DwIFAg&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=k0DrrBeS0St-D1jEwNQ_u1ZyHQXQly5fgCsWF0VTh7o&m=x3v0MKH1xgizJ7PZXaUMAHZ3m-SlLAkX9S2ThME68Hj8igr7oX82Vml_Ug8nBNOM&s=8sfIrVrjur--cXiz35I-e-oBUmwQ5MZFtZqy-6qtu94&e=
>
> Thanks,
> Regards,
> --Bruno
>
> Orange Restricted
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 11:22 PM
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org; pals-chairs@ietf.org; DetNet Chairs <
> detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
> Subject: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network
> Action Indicators
>
> MPLS Working Group, MPLS Open DT,
>
> The MPLS Network Actions (MNA) framework requires a method of indicating
> the presence of a Network Action and any Ancillary Data.
>
> Is the consensus of the working group that we do this by:
>
>    (1) allocating a new SPL for Network Action Indicators?
>
>    (2) re-purposing the ELI SPL?
>
>    (3) using some other method of indicating this such as making it an
>        additional property of an ordinary label?
>
> Please respond to the MPLS WG mail list.
>
> Loa Andersson
> for the Open DT wg chairs
>
> --
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_mpls&d=DwIFAg&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=k0DrrBeS0St-D1jEwNQ_u1ZyHQXQly5fgCsWF0VTh7o&m=x3v0MKH1xgizJ7PZXaUMAHZ3m-SlLAkX9S2ThME68Hj8igr7oX82Vml_Ug8nBNOM&s=QHgUyv-vdnaMYsdlQT_ggsG_SBMFtlw4d053DQ1ftUg&e=
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
> recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
> falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
> delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
>