Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators

["Zafar Ali (zali)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Loa and chairs, 

This is the email on the scope of the poll that remains unanswered (in the context of poll2 and its consensus). 

Thanks

Regards … Zafar 

 

On 6/8/22, 11:34 AM, "mpls on behalf of [e-mail]" <[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:

    Hi Loa,

    I have a clarification question on the below poll, regarding the extension of the ELI bSPL.

    Is the scope of the question specific to the MPLS Network Actions (MNA) framework?
    Or is the scope more general and include any extension of the ELI bSPL and in particular applies to draft [1]?

    [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id/

    Thanks,
    Regards,
    --Bruno

    Orange Restricted

    -----Original Message-----
    From: mpls <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
    Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 11:22 PM
    To: [e-mail]
    Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; DetNet Chairs <[e-mail]>
    Subject: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators

    MPLS Working Group, MPLS Open DT,

    The MPLS Network Actions (MNA) framework requires a method of indicating 
    the presence of a Network Action and any Ancillary Data.

    Is the consensus of the working group that we do this by:

       (1) allocating a new SPL for Network Action Indicators?

       (2) re-purposing the ELI SPL?

       (3) using some other method of indicating this such as making it an
           additional property of an ordinary label?

    Please respond to the MPLS WG mail list.

    Loa Andersson
    for the Open DT wg chairs

    -- 
    Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
    Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
    Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: [phone]

    _______________________________________________
    mpls mailing list
    [e-mail]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

    _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
    pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
    a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
    Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

    This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
    they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
    If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
    As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
    Thank you.

    _______________________________________________
    mpls mailing list
    [e-mail]
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls