IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Fri, 17 June 2022 03:04 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375A2C14CF1F; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 20:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MiP3kE9xO4wx; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 20:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EFECC14F72F; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 20:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id be31so4955816lfb.10; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 20:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ryP+I4EPT0LD2SQ5VSRD/n+GRPaNjdNi4YRUrT7xEQM=; b=SUmYvU+EExBqsVlC4+n711eJKoG8MSKT8DgQCSBQTRwSsgwouzYHlRiSxq6dncU+Ts xbLnJX1ShcLj5ttG3BZYHLQxgJwdFsDc1dSGcbBNOE4JImldsMABfiPqjOml4DTkJuas ZhwAPMEeLE0S2Y8Q9wbaOiYLiVF+VNRM6hYHiWf9Xf7QJeYLgNs8pOn/RCXvDpWnO1sW XLrHgxFA5OGlTe6hTsLnS4JpDj9qnDGlXGec9woPYlvdyy3zhImPkHPWsqT/wt1R4DAY v0hGJpimwYtyzZ0U6SG33aLLk6lYffFBidrbLYd1SPKiFnLznKeu3CJsAtqoByOTVvZY be9Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ryP+I4EPT0LD2SQ5VSRD/n+GRPaNjdNi4YRUrT7xEQM=; b=UexC7vzgFwVcDv2JZTu1qQmoya1R7nx/fC/al7YVeMakRBiOR4yZDao88HANK1w0oQ D4WY0leIwxlDdgfrgc109T8BbAhNlJeKSBZzl9yLSh5h6C85cYSTZi7r8sg6wMPiunUe hEyV/3avy5JEnZPmHR98+lspO3cZEDM1cWDajZM0b1d5ZmeC2WTTMRZjqMkBwcdetytF xpqFS/B9VejzpQHcWGg4IfW+aTCAuwcmsBBvH6WSSaU4lLhZJoSgl/+rM6KM73MIMDGK P6nhbwG55AePzWkaRzG3hIPH9BNEQ9QUkyWqtVHlw3KkzmUUf5cutm+NVvkucDxHP+9G k/hQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+aMBdQaCGrvpMGXgREY3odyOPcSKrcze0Dq24Jh4yNaA4HvedZ IP0+5HLF790xqyofR15VeSdwgVYkdbYQOHIGV2SL8/qw
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uIh7ukWgAHveb2LjWPuivaFRjYdD2pRMcZ0jHEzATTDgOu1coeHYLVWkraDpoBA6+Aaa8AwPL47UwmT/LpkoU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:398b:b0:47f:3ebc:7e14 with SMTP id j11-20020a056512398b00b0047f3ebc7e14mr4425824lfu.570.1655435040226; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 20:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6e5c6fa9-539f-80c3-7c92-5b97ad67560c@pi.nu> <447_1654704927_62A0CB1F_447_309_1_1f59cd955500419a988e2218a3f2246e@orange.com> <9F79E3D5-7ACE-4D15-83D7-8BF3FF60F671@gmail.com> <C9D1FD4A-2549-49C0-8904-84E3F559E85C@cisco.com> <988F5CAF-1A12-4209-92B5-B9AE75477B5C@tony.li> <55e92766b8d448bbaa93d0f9902e439e@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <55e92766b8d448bbaa93d0f9902e439e@huawei.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 20:03:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmX=XCxw5Fm4mxd4zFF8JuHn=XCVM=rpQSWvB5NLm13_fA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000085810805e19c0199"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/xHzunBzOLblaILFhMwwiS1IKIDs>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 03:04:03 -0000

Hi Tianran,
I agree that we can learn from an implementor's experience. But I don't
think a solution must be standardized only because it is implemented.

Regards,
Greg

On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 6:09 PM Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran=
40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Looking at Zafar’s reply, I do not feel any uncomfortable.
>
> Kireeti claimed hardware cannot do something. Zafar just showed an
> implementation example to justify.
>
> I my opinion, the implementation practice should be encouraged.
>
>
>
> Tianran
>
> *From:* mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Tony Li
> *Sent:* Friday, June 17, 2022 3:10 AM
> *To:* Zafar Ali (zali) <zali=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Cc:* mpls@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org; pals-chairs@ietf.org; DetNet
> Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying
> Network Action Indicators
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The draft has been implemented for the exact (SLID) use-case on hardware
> platforms based on Broadcom Jericho2 family of ASIC
> Please take a look at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id-04#section-7
>
> No such issue was noted
>
>
>
>
>
> And Jericho2 is the only thing that counts in the entire world?
>
>
>
> T
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email