Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators

bruno.decraene@orange.com Wed, 08 June 2022 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A1AC14CF18; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iSMJZ_gUXMPV; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 908DCC14CF0F; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar05.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfedar22.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4LJB8f6tGVz2xWY; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 17:33:54 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1654702435; bh=pATu76x79+kOiBOCVndolRfLBX7WpqQeIoGOA3YMlBI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=IP2moWRT7RtoJy16cKrKEHLkIpiSMEgS8/6AlCBvQw7TadoYIezD3HxRpOcrZyVqk YHKdbSOvJOQ5MhtH1+uMrsragwJBEdzzdIPv3rhANVVjS/kotA2AGlOVZHPCZRDnum cue4hW8AHv3nYnLtbDZJNvqE5x0MHhS8qbxK3SbvkTR4wrSUspERtXWTTiZn6dwibY v25fA8nRdDKu6enifR7nTGtxz1O+s0ABTO41DDJ4mb8vmb3kv7V9CRreDlhjB2CJg1 1f0dn6DhRcHluMJQVXkvHUwVRriwqGTDM1f68o8JvbB1Y6jcj380RfvTS5raMVL87O QvEO6NbYNyZjA==
From: bruno.decraene@orange.com
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
CC: "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id@ietf.org" <draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators
Thread-Index: AQHYdGtKJ9EtfhOKFUW8EFVWa4lgka1Fr/kA
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 15:33:54 +0000
Message-ID: <3690_1654702434_62A0C162_3690_400_1_5144e9cb87b749ff8b0ff6e40818e6dc@orange.com>
References: <6e5c6fa9-539f-80c3-7c92-5b97ad67560c@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <6e5c6fa9-539f-80c3-7c92-5b97ad67560c@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_SetDate=2022-06-08T15:33:52Z; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_Name=Orange_restricted_external.2; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_SiteId=90c7a20a-f34b-40bf-bc48-b9253b6f5d20; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_ActionId=9d7791b9-adc8-4db3-9e47-e13bdfb62117; MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_ContentBits=2
x-originating-ip: [10.115.26.52]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/iriduYoptfhOUpVH6r8gfybp-Lw>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 15:34:00 -0000

Hi Loa,

I have a clarification question on the below poll, regarding the extension of the ELI bSPL.

Is the scope of the question specific to the MPLS Network Actions (MNA) framework?
Or is the scope more general and include any extension of the ELI bSPL and in particular applies to draft [1]?

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-decraene-mpls-slid-encoded-entropy-label-id/

Thanks,
Regards,
--Bruno

Orange Restricted

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2022 11:22 PM
To: mpls@ietf.org
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org; pals-chairs@ietf.org; DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] Poll 2: New SPL vs re-purposed ELI for carrying Network Action Indicators

MPLS Working Group, MPLS Open DT,

The MPLS Network Actions (MNA) framework requires a method of indicating 
the presence of a Network Action and any Ancillary Data.

Is the consensus of the working group that we do this by:

   (1) allocating a new SPL for Network Action Indicators?

   (2) re-purposing the ELI SPL?

   (3) using some other method of indicating this such as making it an
       additional property of an ordinary label?

Please respond to the MPLS WG mail list.

Loa Andersson
for the Open DT wg chairs

-- 
Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.