IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] Anyone want just Configured Subscriptions? (was RE: LC on subscribed-notifications-10)

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Wed, 04 July 2018 20:15 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425EF13108C for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 13:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h3uU8VIK3jzP for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 13:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from anna.localdomain (anna.eecs.jacobs-university.de [IPv6:2001:638:709:5::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D72D12F295 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 13:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by anna.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 501) id F2BD322DCF5C; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 22:15:18 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 22:15:18 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180704201518.el3v4gsay43i7bhm@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Mail-Followup-To: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
References: <4df95162a0a8464b884c4e88268df8ca@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <DBD6B0CC-FE74-4C5A-A318-C96C8FBE11FE@sit.fraunhofer.de> <858F63BA-37A2-4925-B340-4DD79CEBEEF9@juniper.net> <CABCOCHTux6+pW=0xhPsgVKWqAr5uNKTNW-Qgv5CpV06Ki1hd-g@mail.gmail.com> <8c68a8ce85d946579f325e311a8e67a9@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <D9AB67AB-A0B2-4D04-8672-76B704800C86@juniper.net> <CABCOCHQjYHYomj1ES+0bH2pOaJZ4Wa_z3suQiJpASmDXP35teg@mail.gmail.com> <2707704d84354cb784e0d2ae001bc599@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2707704d84354cb784e0d2ae001bc599@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180622
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/cGzEB9rkKUKFoP67rsPFluhx_-c>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Anyone want just Configured Subscriptions? (was RE: LC on subscribed-notifications-10)
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2018 20:15:23 -0000

On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 08:04:40PM +0000, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote:
> 
> The open question here is whether we mandate the NETCONF call-home work as a dependency.    If the WG wishes, we could close WGLC on Subscribed-notifications and YANG-push, and leave just NETCONF-Notif open until ietf-netconf-server completes.  But the downside would be that it would leave NETCONF transport for dynamic subscriptions undefined.
>

Who is behind the NAT?

(a) notification generator
(b) notification receiver
(c) both

For which scenario is NETCONF call-home needed?

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email