IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [NSIS] IPR Disclosure: The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-nsis-tunnel-13

Roland Bless <roland.bless@kit.edu> Fri, 03 December 2010 22:48 UTC

Return-Path: <roland.bless@kit.edu>
X-Original-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04903A67B4 for <nsis@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:48:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XNE2S45JlPiv for <nsis@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:48:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de [141.3.10.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93033A69B8 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:48:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from irams1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.10.5]) by iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtps port 25 id 1POeRG-0000Wm-0m; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:49:20 +0100
Received: from i72ms.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de ([141.3.70.5] helo=smtp.ipv6.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de) by irams1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtps port 25 id 1POeRF-0007v2-1h; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:49:13 +0100
Received: from vorta.tm.uka.de (roland.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de [IPv6:2001:638:204:6:21b:fcff:fe96:fe02]) by smtp.ipv6.tm.uni-karlsruhe.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDC82FC00A; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 23:49:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vorta.tm.uka.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E9B82AE; Fri, 3 Dec 2010 23:49:12 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4CF973E7.8060300@kit.edu>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 23:49:11 +0100
From: Roland Bless <roland.bless@kit.edu>
Organization: Institute of Telematics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Thunderbird/1.5 Mnenhy/0.7.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
References: <16948_1291392106_ZZ0LCV004U30IYQ3.00_20101203160010.338FE28C1CF@core3.amsl.com> <4CF91E92.4090109@tkk.fi> <201012032227.oB3MRZKD022720@sj-core-5.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <201012032227.oB3MRZKD022720@sj-core-5.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ATIS-AV: ClamAV (irams1.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de)
X-ATIS-AV: ClamAV (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de)
X-ATIS-AV: Kaspersky (iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de)
X-ATIS-Timestamp: iramx2.ira.uni-karlsruhe.de 1291416560.824796000
Cc: Jukka Manner <jukka.manner@tkk.fi>, nsis <nsis@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [NSIS] IPR Disclosure: The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-nsis-tunnel-13
X-BeenThere: nsis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Next Steps in Signaling <nsis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nsis>
List-Post: <mailto:nsis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:48:05 -0000

Hi James,

On 03.12.2010 23:27, James M. Polk wrote:
> With respect, this is crazy.
> 
> 11 months after the WGLC for this doc the authors submit an IPR
> statement?  This document has been a WG item since June 2006. Exactly
> when didn't they have time to come forward with a notification, say in
> 2007, or 2008 or 2009?

Fully agree, I don't understand this either.
Obviously, the patent application was filed in 2006 already.
Looking at:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-shen-nsis-tunnel-02.txt:
the usual boilerplate says:
   By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
   applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
   have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
   aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

??????
see also section 6.2 of RFC 3979, which has not been followed...

Regards,
 Roland

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email