IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [NSIS] IPR Disclosure: The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-nsis-tunnel-13

Al Morton <acmorton@att.com> Tue, 07 December 2010 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB52828C0F3 for <nsis@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:34:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.263, BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z5nfRAfh0NVz for <nsis@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:34:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail146.messagelabs.com (mail146.messagelabs.com [216.82.241.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A48828C0F8 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:34:54 -0800 (PST)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: acmorton@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-146.messagelabs.com!1291757752!19774059!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.9; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.145]
Received: (qmail 6585 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 21:35:52 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp6.sbc.com (HELO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.145) by server-3.tower-146.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 21:35:52 -0000
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB7LaBvs032541 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:36:11 -0500
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB7La97U032490 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:36:09 -0500
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB7LZnfN022552 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:35:49 -0500
Received: from dns.maillennium.att.com (mailgw1.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB7LZkqh022440 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:35:46 -0500
Message-Id: <201012072135.oB7LZkqh022440@alpd052.aldc.att.com>
Received: from acmt.att.com (vpn-135-70-103-143.vpn.swst.att.com[135.70.103.143](misconfigured sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with SMTP id <20101207213544gw1004lkqqe>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 21:35:45 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.103.143]
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:36:12 -0500
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>, Jukka Manner <jukka.manner@tkk.fi>
From: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>
In-Reply-To: <201012072111.oB7LBTlU012535@sj-core-4.cisco.com>
References: <16948_1291392106_ZZ0LCV004U30IYQ3.00_20101203160010.338FE28C1CF@core3.amsl.com> <4CF91E92.4090109@tkk.fi> <08BD9ABB-99DB-419A-BBD9-BB06733CDF34@nokia.com> <201012072111.oB7LBTlU012535@sj-core-4.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: nsis <nsis@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [NSIS] IPR Disclosure: The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-nsis-tunnel-13
X-BeenThere: nsis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Next Steps in Signaling <nsis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nsis>
List-Post: <mailto:nsis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:34:55 -0000

At 04:11 PM 12/7/2010, James M. Polk wrote:
>...It's hard for me - with a straight face - to go with option (a) 
>because of the time involved prior to the IPR disclosure since -00 
>(June 2006), especially the time past WGLC (11 months).

I suspected that the terms might have something to do
with the tragically late disclosure when voting for a),
but I'd *still* like to hear a word or two from the authors
on all of this.  Then there will be less need to speculate.

Al

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email