IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [NSIS] IPR Disclosure: The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-nsis-tunnel-13

Jukka Manner <jukka.manner@tkk.fi> Wed, 08 December 2010 07:08 UTC

Return-Path: <jukka.manner@tkk.fi>
X-Original-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C473A66B4 for <nsis@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:08:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ksD5PsDDuTd8 for <nsis@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:08:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-1.hut.fi (smtp-1.hut.fi [130.233.228.91]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC7D3A67BD for <nsis@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 23:08:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (katosiko.hut.fi [130.233.228.115]) by smtp-1.hut.fi (8.13.6/8.12.10) with ESMTP id oB87A3na019537 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:10:03 +0200
Received: from smtp-1.hut.fi ([130.233.228.91]) by localhost (katosiko.hut.fi [130.233.228.115]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 08974-768 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:10:03 +0200 (EET)
Received: from smtp.netlab.hut.fi (luuri.netlab.hut.fi [130.233.154.177]) by smtp-1.hut.fi (8.13.6/8.12.10) with ESMTP id oB879vf7019519 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:09:57 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.netlab.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572DC1E1D1 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:09:57 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at luuri.netlab.hut.fi
Received: from smtp.netlab.hut.fi ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (luuri.netlab.hut.fi [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Bif+vbrcvsO8 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:09:53 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [192.168.100.47] (a91-152-186-160.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.152.186.160]) by smtp.netlab.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FE9B1E144 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 09:09:53 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4CFF2F40.5020207@tkk.fi>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 09:09:52 +0200
From: Jukka Manner <jukka.manner@tkk.fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9pre) Gecko/20100818 Lanikai/3.1.3pre
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: nsis@ietf.org
References: <16948_1291392106_ZZ0LCV004U30IYQ3.00_20101203160010.338FE28C1CF@core3.amsl.com> <4CF91E92.4090109@tkk.fi> <16948_1291628001_ZZ0LD00044K2JKHH.00_4CFCADD6.2010300@kit.edu> <4CFD3A48.90803@tkk.fi> <15612_1291676254_ZZ0LD100LV63RXO4.00_12593_1291676253_4CFD6A5D_12593_1304_1_4CFD6A4B.5070304@kit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <15612_1291676254_ZZ0LD100LV63RXO4.00_12593_1291676253_4CFD6A5D_12593_1304_1_4CFD6A4B.5070304@kit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-TKK-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.1.2-hutcc at katosiko.hut.fi
Subject: Re: [NSIS] IPR Disclosure: The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-nsis-tunnel-13
X-BeenThere: nsis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Next Steps in Signaling <nsis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nsis>
List-Post: <mailto:nsis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 07:08:40 -0000

Right.

I went over the history and the QoS NSLP introduced the binding concept 
in early 2004, so 2.5 years before the patent application was filed. So, 
the QoS NSLP is not affected and most of the IPR itself is invalid. 
Whether the patent is valid when you apply the same published concept 
and technology when binging tunnel sessions instead of QoS sessions, I 
don't know.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nsis-qos-nslp-02

Moreover, the application was filed four months _after_ the document 
describing the binding for tunnels was approved as a WG item.

Since then the first actual technical changes to the spec were done in 
late 2008, two years after the patent application was filed.

Jukka

On 12/07/2010 12:57 AM, Roland Bless wrote:
> Hi Jukka,
>
> On 06.12.2010 20:32, Jukka Manner wrote:
>> Hi Roland, thanks for your detailed analysis. You are right that the QoS
>> NSLP would not necessarily included the binding concept had we known
>> Columbia had a hidden IPR on it. So, essentially the IPR also affects
>> the QoS NSLP. And the issue with RFC 2764 is pretty good, actually -
>> interesting how the same stuff gets patented years after publishing it
>> the first time. ;)
>
> Not quite. AFAIK it is a patent _application_, but not a valid patent
> yet. IMHO, RFC 2746 is a very close match and thus the patent should
> not be granted w.r.t. most of its claims.
>
> Regards,
>   Roland
> _______________________________________________
> nsis mailing list
> nsis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis

-- 
Jukka MJ Manner, Professor, PhD.  Phone:  +358+(0)9+470 22481
Aalto University                  Mobile: +358+(0)50+5112973
Department of Communications      Fax:    +358+(0)9+470 22474
and Networking (Comnet)           Office: G320a (Otakaari 5A)
P.O. Box 13000, FIN-00076 Aalto   E-mail: jukka.manner@tkk.fi
Finland                           WWW:    www.comnet.tkk.fi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email