IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] minutes part 2

"Glen Kent" <glen.kent@gmail.com> Thu, 18 December 2008 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <opsec-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsec-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-opsec-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2103A6B39; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:01:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7877D3A6B35 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:01:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pM6ntu-J-PU4 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:01:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f21.google.com (mail-bw0-f21.google.com [209.85.218.21]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BDD3A6955 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:01:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so1848773bwz.13 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:01:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=7ZXsbkQAaUXTRTt5IU2OcmN9VZQW7Ikt/mw8JzayIdg=; b=N1A/4YLCXsrkqmAoTEKccUc61m+ybcVRdgYtv5PyYSCUHKdG6oOuK16RsGV81FIkUf Qg4mMnC9+rhvh3Zw07Si92WWKK7TmpjEi1tXBXCFsTwQCSj3gwDBS2XMRz/VsSosyA+D gi2aeAuYxcHaLBPlIfo7JvPMiKxBVO5PR0kOs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=JcOb+8lbAmtLdejSd8jUwGGfCHtALxmW0FG7JhBi3JYOTv6fA1ko8qaPwdzX90Hcft +NOt/KlLu+BBTcOVSMHqm7lacIiutL9uoAZhynyo+CFEkjKspQuyydcBRcOjP7Dg9YXg EZDDN8Z48/HbNEAcTSl+1sVZtgQUaaRoyFlTs=
Received: by 10.103.189.15 with SMTP id r15mr800858mup.126.1229616090974; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:01:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.103.160.12 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:01:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <92c950310812180801i10ac5f07l4ed58c87778ca9ba@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:31:30 +0530
From: Glen Kent <glen.kent@gmail.com>
To: R Atkinson <ran.atkinson@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C2E84336-3E35-4D68-BD81-3E222CD681F2@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <EC3F7E1D-F7C8-484A-A0C0-1A25E79AD86E@extremenetworks.com> <92c950310812161620j7d8aaa16m553940edadbe6d8f@mail.gmail.com> <12201E12-8A0B-4FBE-95A9-5C8B23DA46EC@gmail.com> <92c950310812171704x76e374bbv1bd74d74f5ca755b@mail.gmail.com> <C2E84336-3E35-4D68-BD81-3E222CD681F2@gmail.com>
Cc: opsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] minutes part 2
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: opsec-bounces@ietf.org

>> Its experimental. Lets leave it out of the discussion.
>
> It is real and it is (IMHO) a whole lot better than anything
> else we have -- and I understand at least one implementation
> exists.  So we should include it in the discussion.

Is there any deployment of the same? Is the WG interested in this?

Glen
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email